
“Following a well-established pattern, Redflex Traffic Systems, which wants the camera program to survive, filed suit against the city asking the court to block officials from going ahead with the initiative on the November 6 ballot. City officials also support the cameras. After residents presented a legally binding petition for a ballot measure banning the cameras immediately, the city council re-wrote the measure so that, if passed, it would amend the city charter with a provision that would not ban cameras until 2014.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/38/3879.asp
Related posts:
Linden Lab Changes ToS Around Second Life Currency to Comply With US Treasury?
Protection Against Indefinite Detention Mysteriously Stripped From NDAA
9/11 anti-sledding provision repealed in $1.15 trillion federal spending deal
Where Nervous Europeans Are Really Putting Their Money
Cuba: No More Exit Visas!
Again, Reuters Compares Central Bankers to Superheroes!
These Guys Made $3 Million In Four Days From The Bitcoin Craze
Maryland Senate Votes To Cover Up Speed Camera Errors
Who Could Possibly Be Safe when Police Are Around?
TWTC Stock Explodes In Another Case Of Mistaken Twitter Identity?
Holder promises to ease marijuana law enforcement in states with legal pot
Unlocking Cellphones Becomes Illegal Saturday
It’s time we saw economic sanctions for what they really are – war crimes
DOL Fiduciary Rule Is ‘Biggest Change' To Investment Advice Industry
The Lifespan of Storage Media