
“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
Related posts:
Leniency for a Uniformed Sexual Predator
Illinois Bill to Register Buyers of Gold and Silver Coins
Even who we’re in a drone war with is classified
British UKIP Convulsion Significant Threat to Tories
Bitcoin Mining Unit Sells on eBay for US$10,866.88
US Government Moves To Seize 139-Year-Old Family Gold Mines
Bitcoin Survival Guide: Everything You Need About the Future of Money
Some Breathing Room for Iran
GOP Suing to Keep Third Parties Off Ballot in November
Latin America Says ‘Adiós’ to the Populist Left
How police officers’ military uniforms affect their mental state
Love Child of Bitcoin and GitHub Pays Cash for Code
Dick Bove: US Assault on JPMorgan Is 'Coordinated from Above'
GreenBank Capital makes first Bitcoin angel investment
Brookings Institution on Colorado Pot Legalization: 'Resounding Success'