“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
(Visited 176 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Employment Ratios: Total, Men, and Women
Man Has Home Ransacked by Police for Paying Cash
Body scanner ruling could squelch NSA domestic spying
Florida man arrested for ‘molesting a manatee’
BitPay Offers ‘Free and Unlimited’ Payment Processing for Merchants
The EU's Copyright Proposal is Extremely Bad News for Everyone, Especially Wikipedia
Twitter Nears Deal With Payments Startup Stripe
Silicon Valley VC Thinks a Single Bitcoin Will Be Worth $100,000
Police hid use of cell phone tracking device from judge because of NDA
Unprecedented: Bank Of New York Freezes $23 Billion In Kazakh Assets
New York: Judge Rules Careful Driving Is Not A Crime
2017 Was Safest Year for Cops in Nearly 50 Years—Worst For Citizens
CA Governor Pushes Statewide Drinking Water Tax To Clean Up Farm Pollution
Russian banks ramping up gold purchases at record pace
Maryland Senate Passes Marijuana Decriminalization