
“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
(Visited 179 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Teens Start Rental Car Company, Get Sued By City Of San Francisco For 'Unfair Business Practices'
Cop Violently Slams Handcuffed School Girl Into Concrete; No Drugs Found
Bitcoin Mining Is Getting Out of Control
Ninth Circuit Gives the A-OK For Warrantless Home Video Surveillance
Report: Obama Spends $180K Per Day Undermining State Medical Marijuana Laws
A Bitcoin for Your Thoughts
America's New Female Combatants Are Getting Custom Gear
Red Light Scameras Expanded In Pennsylvania
Toobin Preaches Sanctity of Gov. Secrets, Despite Himself Stealing Classified Docs
Google facing $5 billion antitrust fine in India
This Is What A $2.3 Million Pizza Looks Like
Skype Translator Preview now open to all Windows users
California gets face scanners to spy on everyone at once
The Role Disability Insurance is Playing in Discouraging Young Adults from Working
Homeland Studies