
“Some residents are complaining that the signs are offensive, and they worry about the message being sent to their kids. Town officials, for their part, say the signs have to go—not because of their content, but because Mr. Sullivan did not get the proper permits needed to put up the signs in the first place. But Sullivan said through his lawyer that his billboards are protected by the First Amendment, and that he will not take them down. His lawyer, in a letter to the town, rebuffed their demand and said that the signs were political speech and therefore should be allowed to stand.”
Related posts:
America’s Long History of Trying to Determine Who Rules Syria
Son of ex-American abroad: 'It’s like watching a house on fire'
Documenting "Detainee Treatment [sic for 'Torture']"
Blowback: How U.S. Drones, Coups, and Invasions Create More Violence
Open the Window and Let Out Tedious Tapering
Why Your Take Home Pay WILL DROP in 2013
The Purpose of Government is to Exploit -- and Exacerbate -- a Crisis
Venezuela’s House of Cards
Indiana: Court Overturns Stop For Hole In Tail Light
Bitcoin Payment Network For Self-Driving Cars And Roads
Veteran’s Guns Confiscated After Forced ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’
Bitcoin’s Evolution Will be SWIFT
ICE is about to start tracking license plates across the US
FATCA Reciprocity Will Now Target Delaware?
US military wants a portable, bullet-resistant wall that fits in a can