
“After riots swept parts of the United Kingdom last year, I wrote about the moral argument for gun ownership. Simply stated, it is wrong to disarm law-abiding people, particularly when there is a risk of societal breakdown. The same argument is equally applicable in the areas ravaged by the recent storm to hit the northeastern United States. As you can see from this report in the New York Post, the government is failing in its responsibility to provide law and order.”
Related posts:
How to negotiate directly with physicians and hospitals
Police Chief Mark Kessler: Academy trains officers to treat everyone like a criminal
The Next Domino: Slovenia Government Bond Yields Spike
Legal loophole allows new belt-fed AR-15 that sprays bullets
Gold, the Titanic & Lifeboats - Why it's Important to Own Physical Gold
US officials: New leaker compromised national security after Snowden
AIPAC comes out for strike on Syria, mentions Iran more often than Syria
Obama may back FBI proposal for expansive Internet wiretapping powers
11 GOP convention speakers who actually ‘didn’t build that’
Your chance to read a secret Pentagon document
Philippines to disband anti-drug death squads after killing South Korean businessman
Bitcoin Mining Pool Ghash.io DDoS-ed in Response to 51% Status?
California Urged To Post Information On Fukushima Disaster Risk
SecondMarket’s bitcoin offering defines new asset class
Homeland Security built domestic surveillance tech into Predator drones