“Richard O’Dwyer has never been to the United States. Not once. His Internet site ran on servers in Sweden. Neither Sweden nor his home country has charged him with a crime. So how in the world could the United States government make a case against O’Dwyer and enforce its laws against a foreign citizen like this? Because he used a .com domain name. All .com domains (among many other global top level domains or gTLDs) are registered with Versign, a US-based company. The implications of this are huge. Can the US government exert its laws against a non-US website based on the registry used for that domain name?”
Related posts:
Massachusetts Attorney General: Pot shops allowed statewide
A Year Later, A Veteran Still Sits In Jail, Denied Bail For Leaking Now-Public Docs
All You Need to Know About The U.S. Government
Joe Biden Sees 'No Legal Reason' Not To Tax Violent Video Games
Female inmates sue Texas county for running ‘rape camp’ at jail
Maryland County Eyes Drone Ban: ‘This Is Not The Soviet Union’
Brooklyn Bodega Owner: Why Merchants Should Start Accepting Bitcoin
U.S. Conference of Mayors asks Obama for flexibility on marijuana
Why You Shouldn’t Gamble With Uncle Sam
“Abolish ICE” is becoming more than just a protest cry
Same sex marriage measures approved in three states
Additional $2.1M Seized from Mt. Gox Accounts – Now Over $5M Total
The Heroic Spirit of Business
The Larger the Deficit, the Greater the Default
Oregon Prosecutors Still Wasting Resources on Medical Cannabis