
“Over the past two decades, advocates have argued the main advantage of a speed camera is that the machines never lies. Most states codify this belief with a legal presumption that the automated citation is accurate and it is up to the defendant to prove otherwise. In Baltimore, Maryland last week a leading speed camera vendor made the unprecedented admission that the technology frequently lies, but obvious examples of false readings slipped through the process due to ‘human error’.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/39/3976.asp
Related posts:
Obama’s Phony Free Trade Treaty That He Won’t Let Congress See
Mining’s bearish pendulum swinging, but half of execs retiring
The Anti-Default Pomposity of U.S. Officials
As Secretive "Stingray" Surveillance Tool Becomes More Pervasive, Questions Over Its Illegality Incr...
Why Facebook Would Have Banned Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin
Mike Hearn, Bitcoin Developer - Turing Festival 2013
Do Police See Guns as a threat to "Officer Safety"?
The Bush-Obama Great Stagnation
Why do we have faith in gold? (one simple statistic)
One Man's Terrorist
Wireless 'smart meters' tell snoopers when you are not home
Fracking settlement puts permanent gag order on 7-year-old and 10-year-old
Three Exciting New Passport Programs… Or Are They?
ACLU Report Exposes Extent Of License Plate Surveillance
North Carolina Allows HOA Rent-A-Cops To Make Illegal DUI Arrests