
“Over the past two decades, advocates have argued the main advantage of a speed camera is that the machines never lies. Most states codify this belief with a legal presumption that the automated citation is accurate and it is up to the defendant to prove otherwise. In Baltimore, Maryland last week a leading speed camera vendor made the unprecedented admission that the technology frequently lies, but obvious examples of false readings slipped through the process due to ‘human error’.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/39/3976.asp
Related posts:
Andreas Antonopoulos on the IRS Bitcoin Tax Ruling
Feds Crack Encrypted Drives, Arrest Child Porn Suspect
Deadly Contradictions: Patent Privilege vs. “Saving Lives”
Chicago Sun-Times First Major US Newspaper to Accept Bitcoin
US Marines Put On Alert To Move Into Egypt Amid Violent Protests
Ukraine Protestors Turn to Bitcoin to Ease Cash Crisis
Gold Stocks 101 (10 Gold Stocks Not To Own)
Student Loans are About to Cross the Trillion Dollar Mark
Obamacare: Insuring Lawlessness
Ben Swann Reality Check: Monsanto and Crony Capitalism
Heat-seeking US election rhetoric finds Swiss “piracy”
Arizona Citizens Tracked In REAL ID Facial Recognition Database
A Ceasefire in the IRS’ War on US Citizens?
Rise of Private Security Is Citizen Response to Declining Police Service
One Man's Terrorist