“Despite Swartz’s family literally placing the blame for his death on the state, and both MIT and JSTOR releasing public statements that were largely positive in how they portrayed him, a spokesperson for Ortiz told the Los Angeles Times, ‘We want to respect the privacy of the family and do not feel it is appropriate to comment on the case at this time.’ After a year and a half of state harassment, the threat of over 30 years in prison and a $1 million fine hanging over Swartz’s head, after both JSTOR and MIT dropped their criminal charges, the government went after Swartz like a rabid dog – and got a kill.”
(Visited 38 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
How a $1 Bag of Salt Water Becomes a $546 Bill at Hospitals
Lawlessness of the West
NYT Sees ‘Dystopia’ in Chinese Surveillance—Which Looks a Lot Like US Surveillance
Moral of the Story: Tax Havens Are Okay if You’re a Politically Connected Leftist
Central Banking: Sterile as the Grave
Australia Joins The War On Cash While Venezuela Backtracks Cash Ban
Al-Qaeda now a US ally in Syria
Ron Paul on Bernanke's Criminal Gang
Free Movement for U.S. Goods But Not for U.S. Citizens?
Bill Bonner: It’s a dangerous time of year
Outrage at Trump is phony; US leaders have praised dictators for decades
Jeffrey Tucker: Has the Fed Met Its Match?
Sweden’s Military Madness: Conscription and Propaganda
The Strange Moral Compass of Christopher Dorner
'Credibility'