“Apparently, when the legislature wrote New York’s new gun law, they did not exempt the police, who carry 15 rounds in their handguns and much more in their ‘assault rifles.’ Not surprisingly, they already are working on an amendment to allow the police to ignore the law. The standard response is that the police must fight the ‘bad guys,’ who are heavily armed. However, since the U.S. Supreme Court already has ruled that the police have no legal obligation to protect regular citizens, why is it right for police to be able to protect themselves but citizens cannot?”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/130846.html
(Visited 45 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Jim Sinclair: Swiss Bank Refuses Physical Gold Delivery On "Anti-Terrorism" Grounds
Oakland to ban hammers, wrenches, tripods, walking canes, shields and other 'tools of vandalism' dur...
Wireless 'smart meters' tell snoopers when you are not home
France Changes Constitution To Protect "Emergency" Police Powers
Disarm Subjects and Make them Spy on Each Other: New York State's Totalitarian Formula
Foodflation - Since QE3, Breakfast Is Up Over 24%
Nigel Farage: Major European Bank Runs Now Taking Place
Former S.C. Republican official: ‘C*cksucker’ anti-war vet should have ‘come home in a body bag’
Hoarding Gold: China’s Plan for Survival
Google pulls leading robots from DARPA involvement
Missouri man facing charges for using fake penis to pass drug test
Health Canada Approves Heroin Maintenance
Founder reflects on the closure of Bitcoin stock exchange GLBSE
Rootkit-Based Adware Wreaks Havoc Among U.S. Windows 10 Users
Get ready for Washington’s “Automatic IRAs”