“Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill. He must think we should be relieved. Oddly, under current law, Congress and the courts are involved when presidents eavesdrop on Americans, detain them or harshly interrogate them — but not when they kill them.”
Related posts:
How, Exactly, Does A Travel Ban Keep Us Safe?
State Department: “We cannot make India look at you as an American”
Facial Recognition Toll Booths Identify Drivers And Passengers, Notify Police In Seconds
Can You Trust the Case for War this Time?
Chauvinists and Other Anti-Peace Voices
Crony Capitalists: The Biggest Winners From President Obama's Re-Election
Concealed Carry Proves Guns Are Part of Solution to Gun Violence
Ron Paul: The IRS's Job Is To Violate Our Liberties
Cyprus and the reality of banking: Deposit haircuts are both inevitable and the right thing to do
Controlled Demolition of Europe Continues
Bill Bonner: The Grandest Larceny of All Time
No Syrian War to Save Obama’s Face!
Fast-food worker protests help labor unions, not labor
Putin, gold and silver: What you need to know right now
Cliven Bundy-FBI debacle: Another example of why Feds need to be leashed