“Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill. He must think we should be relieved. Oddly, under current law, Congress and the courts are involved when presidents eavesdrop on Americans, detain them or harshly interrogate them — but not when they kill them.”
Related posts:
DNA's Trap for Investors: A Race to the Bottom
Jeffrey Tucker: Has the Fed Met Its Match?
Short Circuiting The Market
Transparent Hoax Could Lead to War
UN Official Condemns Torture As Trump Plans UN Funding Cuts
Bill Bonner: Sell the House, Sell the Car, Sell the Kids…
Glenn Greenwald: What Foreign Policy “Debate” Means on “Face the Nation”
Eric Margolis: Syrian March To Disaster
No Military Coups for America? What About November 1963?
What a case from mid-1700s Scotland tells us about fungibility of money
Quagmires Are Often Just a Few Steps Away
Bill Bonner: What if Mr. Summers weren't so brilliant, after all?
Fixing the fast-food strike
Trade Wars Mean the End of the Bull Market
Ron Paul: Why Is Washington Backing Saudi Starvation Policy In Yemen?