“Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill. He must think we should be relieved. Oddly, under current law, Congress and the courts are involved when presidents eavesdrop on Americans, detain them or harshly interrogate them — but not when they kill them.”
Did you like this?
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Tip Freedomwat.ch Staff with Bitcoin
Related posts:
Detlev Schlichter: Stimulus, to infinity and beyond
The Democrats Finally Embrace Money Printing
6 Insidious Ways Surveillance Changes the Way We Think and Act
Ron Paul on Bernanke's Criminal Gang
Bill Bonner: The First Shot in the War on Cash?
Jacob Hornberger: The JFK Autopsy Cover-Up
At last, Japan may be about to abandon its disastrous Keynesian consensus
Central Bank Snuffs Out Vietnam’s Thriving Gold Market
Ron Paul, Congress Believes: Spy On Thee, But Not Me
Ron Paul: Why Are We At War In Yemen?
U.S. v. Microsoft: It’s the right to privacy, stupid
Why Is My US Brokerage Firm Closing My Account?
Argentina offers tax amnesty to head off devaluation
Peter Schiff: Cyprus Lifts the Curtain
Peter Schiff: Gold Pullback Explained