“Presidents had never before, to our knowledge, targeted specific Americans for military strikes. There are no court decisions that tell us if he is acting lawfully. Mr. Obama tells us not to worry, though, because his lawyers say it is fine, because experts guide the decisions and because his advisers have set up a careful process to help him decide whom he should kill. He must think we should be relieved. Oddly, under current law, Congress and the courts are involved when presidents eavesdrop on Americans, detain them or harshly interrogate them — but not when they kill them.”
(Visited 42 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Ron Paul: If You Like The Surveillance State, You’ll Love E-Verify
The President Punts in the Syrian War Game
Brandon Raub and the Thought Police
Want a House? Be Rich and Pay Cash
This Could Shake Muni Bonds to the Core
Dot-Coms and Bonds Aren’t So Different after All
Fury at the American Raj
The Deceptive Debate Over What Causes Terrorism Against the West
Jeffrey Tucker: Two Faces, One Totalitarianism
The Last Secular Arab Country
Jim Rogers on the Goldstein show 14 May 2013
Kerry becomes first war casualty
Mocking Obama, Romney, and the Rest of the Political Clowns
Bill Bonner: $10,000 each in two suitcases
The Case Against Gina Haspel, By CIA Agent Who Was Imprisoned For Exposing Torture