“Why did Baltimore need to pay outside consultants half a million dollars for a report that says the city’s financial future is grim? Public Financial Management Inc. of Philadelphia won the contract in 2011 with a proposal to charge the city $460,000, beating two other finalists whose work would have cost taxpayers $500,000 and $507,000, respectively. But the scope of the needed work grew over the past year, and city officials added another $125,000 to the deal — meaning the consultants were paid $585,000 in all.”
Related posts:
5 Years and $7 Later, Homeland Security Returns Seized Hip-Hop Website
McCain says he feels ‘lonely’ on Syria stance
German tax probe prosecutors act on new Swiss data leak
Yellen Sees Little Threat to Financial Stability
Public Health Proposal Considers Mandatory ‘Smokers License’
2 killed, 8 shot by police in shooting near Empire State Building
Russia Mulls 'Limitations' On FATCA Information Exchange With U.S.
Iran to citizens: avoid U.S. travel due to ‘targeted Iranophobia’
White House vows to aggressively combat trade secrets theft in new cybersecurity strategy document
Google wants to build the Star Trek computer
Egypt TV head denies inciting president’s murder
Spain halts evictions of vulnerable homeowners
Federal Reserve likely to end QE stimulus program in October
Fantasy football: Legal questions arise as gambling games grow
United Nations says changing U.S. marijuana laws violate international drug conventions