“Roadside sobriety tests can be used only to gather evidence to convict a driver, not to exonerate him, according to the Kansas Supreme Court. The decision came down in the case of Bruno Edgar, who was stopped at a driver’s license roadblock on July 29, 2007. The officer decided to conduct three of the standard field sobriety tests. Edgar passed the horizontal gaze nystagmus test, passed the one-leg stand and ‘did fine’ on the nine-step walk-and-turn test. The officer then told Edgar he had no choice but to submit to a preliminary breath test (PBT) and that he had no right to consult an attorney regarding the test. Edgar failed and was convicted of DUI.”
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/40/4020.asp
Related posts:
Reality Check: What The Fiscal Cliff Means For Businesses, Employees & The Unemployed
Benghazi Talking Points Underwent 12 Revisions, Scrubbed Of Terror Reference; Risk Of Impeachment
Lying Swiss Bankers Have Trapped American Clients: “Sell Your Gold. Now.”
Air Force officer charged with rape and child molestation
IRS Now Has a Tool to Spy On Bitcoin Users
Dianne Feinstein: First Amendment Is A Special Privilege
Hate Crimes, Hoaxes, and Hyperbole
How the US spends 26% of available tax revenue just to pay interest
How to create an Angry American
The Ex-Im Bank Is Dead (For Now)
Meet the manic miner who wants to mint 10% of all new bitcoins
Obomber: US may be forced to “wipe out” Syrian air defenses
Samsung phones spontaneously text users’ photos to random contacts
The First Commercial 3D Printed Metal Gun Part
Researchers discover new attacks amid telcos' Voice-over-LTE rollout