“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Rahmaland Cigarette Tax Increases by $1 a Pack
Ex-World Bank Counsel: Lawlessness when USD Loses Reserve Status
Is Apple Becoming A War Profiteer?
"Punishment Has Been Achieved"
“You’re Sick, Fatso. I’m Billing Your Insurance Company.”
Hacking an Airplane With Only an Android Phone
The Heartbreaking Story Of A Harmless Deadhead Sentenced To Die In Prison
Vermont: Federal Lawsuit Challenges Bogus Traffic Stop, Lying Cop
100+ complaints and only a demotion: What does it take to fire a bad cop?
Bootstrapping with Tony Gallippi of Bitpay on the tastytrade network
The Retention of Wealth
Van Jones rips Obama’s ‘ridiculous’ denial of domestic spying operations
BitPagos is Bringing Bitcoin to the Developing World
Facebook Security Director, Amazon BD Director Join Coinbase
Ford Exec: 'We Know Everyone Who Breaks The Law' Thanks To GPS