
“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Israel: The missing link in Syria puzzle
Lunlun Zou Guzheng Studio: First Hong Kong Business to Accept Bitcoin
Watch Iran's $40-Million Oil Rig Collapse Into The Sea
Medical marijuana bill approved by New Hampshire House
Bill Bonner: Do You Live Next to One of These Spy Hubs?
Europe's Political Response To Voters May Increase Violence
New product shuts car engines off with a radio pulse
Psychedelic Drugs May Help the Brain Repair Itself, Study Finds
Coinkite Bitcoin Payment Terminal Quick Preview
Tesla-Inspired Metamaterial Converts 900 MHz Microwaves to Power
'We were told to lie' - Bank of America employees open up about foreclosure practices
Tufts University: Study promoting GMO ‘golden rice’ violated ethics rules
Why Amazon’s Fighting So Hard for a CIA Cloud Contract
US nuclear arsenal upgrade to exceed $1 trillion
At Davos the Elite Ponder Stale Cybersecurity Issues—and Charlize Theron