
“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Lightning-Like Transformation
Anatomy of a hack: How crackers ransack passwords like “qeadzcwrsfxv1331”
U.S. Court: DOE Can't Charge For Non-Existent Nuclear Waste Storage
Safeguards can spot fake gold bars
The Early Stages of ObamaCare
How the Beast’s Votaries Justify Themselves
Trump Nuke Plan Resets the Doomsday Clock
Gold Sector Analysis: Gold Blows Up, Travels to 1300 on EU Easing
Slovenia 'Clarifies' Position on Cryptocurrency Tax
MIT researches find gold can control blood clotting
De-Postal Monopoly: Feinstein’s Sweetheart’s Deal
Eighth Amendment circumvented through plea bargaining
UN Claims Uruguay Not Allowed to End Marijuana Prohibition
Canadian regulators welcome US Bitcoin refugees with open arms
Bernanke’s Helicopter, and a Note About 9/11