
“An Arizona appeals court has ruled that marijuana users don’t need to be actually impaired to be successfully prosecuted for driving under the influence. The ruling came Tuesday in the case of a man who tested positive for an inactive marijuana metabolite that remains in the body for weeks after the high from smoking marijuana has worn off. The ruling in Arizona v. Shilgevorkyan overturned a decision by a superior court judge who said that it didn’t make sense to prosecute people for driving under the influence if they’re not actually under the influence.”
http://stopthedrugwar.org/chronicle/2013/feb/14/az_court_says_you_dont_have_be_h
Related posts:
Soylent gets a $1.5 million infusion of venture capital
Square Fined $507K In Florida For Operating Without A Money Transmitter License
Bitcoin Exchange Berlin to Open on Saturday, June 29
Chemical attack was Syria rebel provocation, former hostages say
U.S. Special Forces Are Sent to Tackle Global Threats
2013: The Year Defiance of the State Became Cool
Billionaire: Part-Timers Will Near 50% of Workforce Due to ObamaCare
Bitcoin Gains Credit Union Cred
Cannabis Set to Cause a World of Pain for Big Pharma
Ohio University Considers Mandatory Re-Education Classes For Smokers
Obama rodeo clown: People have lost their ability to laugh
Indian government again urges Indians not to buy gold
The Cost of Terror in Brussels
Meredith Whitney: 'Detroit Will Start A Wave of Municipal Bankruptcies'
Entrepreneurs find new hope in fight against regulators