
“In these attacks, known as ‘signature strikes,’ drone operators fire on people whose identities they do not know based on evidence of suspicious behavior or other ‘signatures.’ According to anonymously sourced media reports, such attacks on unidentified targets account for many, or even most, drone strikes. Despite that, the administration has never publicly spoken about signature strikes. What is the legal justification for signature strikes? What qualifies as a ‘signature’ that would prompt a deadly strike? Do those being targeted have to pose a threat to the United States? And how many civilians have been killed in such strikes?”
http://www.propublica.org/article/drone-war-doctrine-we-know-nothing-about
Related posts:
Cops Being Trained That Cell Phones Could Be Guns
Men busted in Ukraine’s “fake murder” ruse turn out to be Ukrainian Intelligence
Governor Moonbeam and Cronies at Work in California
1 in 4 voters believe robots would make better politicians
Good Morning, Sweetheart: Now You're On Fire, Courtesy of the Local Police
Asking Obama to protect encryption, and why that's not enough
Jeff Sessions' Days Numbered, But His Replacements Aren't Much Better
Hollywood Gets Tax Break Extension, While Payroll Extension Break Ended
In Jefferson County, Drug Cops Run Wild
The Next Step in Killing Cancer
Maybe the Most Orwellian Text Message a Government's Ever Sent
Missouri Cops Ignore State Law, Divert School Funding To Themselves
“Why did you call the police? They don’t help you.”
IRS Official Lois Lerner Refuses To Resign – Gets Paid Leave Of $3,557.69 A Week
UK 'internet safety' plan just means internet censorship