“Imagine Ma Barker’s gang or a gang of John Dillingers who unilaterally declare ‘war’ against the U.S. Would the U.S. in turn declare war against them? Metaphorically it might, in order to show a steely determination to capture and stop them. But does their declaration by itself entitle the U.S. to kill them without an attempt to capture them and place them on trial? Certainly not. Lynching is summary execution. No government can be trusted with the power of summarily killing someone, even if that person has ‘declared war’ on that government. Such a power is too easy to extend and expand and inflict upon the innocent.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133568.html
Related posts:
Officer Safety Uber Alles: Christopher Dorner and the "Rickoverian Paradox"
Man, Method, and Recasting
Stop-and-Frisk: How Government Creates Problems, Then Makes Them Worse
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
Why Are Your Children Buying Houses for Ben Bernanke?
David Galland: The Age of Entitlement
Rand Paul: Is 1984 Now?
Welcome to Police-State America, Weary Traveler
Why the Higher Education System Is Unsustainable (i.e. Doomed)
The Case for Abolishing the Department of Homeland Security
Bill Bonner: Too Much of a Good Thing
As Predicted, Stocks Make New Highs
Paul Craig Roberts: Coup d’etat
Syria and the Perpetual War Economy
Crushing the Middle Class