“Imagine Ma Barker’s gang or a gang of John Dillingers who unilaterally declare ‘war’ against the U.S. Would the U.S. in turn declare war against them? Metaphorically it might, in order to show a steely determination to capture and stop them. But does their declaration by itself entitle the U.S. to kill them without an attempt to capture them and place them on trial? Certainly not. Lynching is summary execution. No government can be trusted with the power of summarily killing someone, even if that person has ‘declared war’ on that government. Such a power is too easy to extend and expand and inflict upon the innocent.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133568.html
Related posts:
The Original Value of Bitcoins
David Galland: How to Tell if You Live in a Police State
The Fed's Asset-Inflation Machine
Mises' Answer to Would-Be Conspirators: You Will Lose
Hiroshima: Lincoln's Legacy to Civilians
After the Storm
In Gold We Trust 2014
David Galland: The Age of Entitlement
Uber vs. the State, 1851 Edition
The Whistleblower’s Guide to the Orwellian Galaxy: How to Leak to the Press
Bill Bonner: How I Explained Bitcoin to My 94-Year-Old Mother
The Road to Debt-Serfdom
Anthony Gregory: The Habeas Corpus Myth
Debt addiction, USA: How much debt reduction has the crisis caused?
Jeffrey Tucker: How the Internet Saved Civilization