“Imagine Ma Barker’s gang or a gang of John Dillingers who unilaterally declare ‘war’ against the U.S. Would the U.S. in turn declare war against them? Metaphorically it might, in order to show a steely determination to capture and stop them. But does their declaration by itself entitle the U.S. to kill them without an attempt to capture them and place them on trial? Certainly not. Lynching is summary execution. No government can be trusted with the power of summarily killing someone, even if that person has ‘declared war’ on that government. Such a power is too easy to extend and expand and inflict upon the innocent.”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/133568.html
Related posts:
Gold and Syria
Credit Outbids Cash = Resource Wars
The impulse to ban
Paying Lip Service to Liberty
A Real and Lasting Peace
Is War With China Inevitable?
The Shoes Keep on Dropping… What Next?
Why US government IT fails so hard, so often
Fifty States of Fear
Detlev Schlichter: Good riddance to deposit ‘insurance’
FATCA: a Tool of the Electronic Surveillance State
An Idiot’s Guide to Bitcoin: the man behind the book
Gangs Remain Key Unaddressed Problem in Gun Debate
"For Your Own Protection"
James Altucher: Why I Won’t Vote