“Should kidnap victims pay their debts? That, roughly, is the question facing Estonia, which issued £700,000 ($3.4m) and $4m in 40-year bonds in 1927, but was then annexed by the Soviet Union in 1940. Most investors swallowed their losses. But not William Hardison, a Florida-based businessman, who holds around $90,000-worth of the septuagenarian paper. Estonia’s booming, debt-free economy is one of the most successful in the ex-communist world. But the situation with Estonia’s kidnapper is rather different. Russia took on the Soviet Union’s assets and liabilities in 1991, and has since bargained hard to get out of paying the latter.”
http://www.economist.com/node/426616
Related posts:
US Corporate Tax Rate So Punitive that Companies Are Moving to Welfare States
The new American Idol: Should the US rule the world?
New York ‘cannibal’ cop watched death porn: wife
FDA warns manufacturers of possible crackdown on caffeinated candies and snacks
New Yorkers Trying to Flee Find Moving Isn’t So Easy
Inside the Hyperloop: the pneumatic travel system faster than the speed of sound
Australian central bank's talk of intervention sends Aussie dollar down
Ron Paul: "I Smell Iraq All Over Again"
Missouri threatens return of gas chambers for death row inmates
Video Killed Trust in Police Officers
Portugal banking crisis sends tremors through Europe
Ron Paul on Cavuto 6/19/2013
Guy Who Started Alabama’s Secession Petition Wants His Topless Car Wash Back
New York cops’ massive salaries are robbing taxpayers blind
In Fed and Out, Many Now Think Inflation Helps