
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Google pulls leading robots from DARPA involvement
Austria Offers ‘Contradictory’ Guidance on Bitcoin’s Financial Status
33,000 Cheers for Liberty in South Africa!
Ecuador’s Correa rips into Snowden coverage; U.S. threatens trade sanctions
Burn Pits’ Legacy: ‘Delay, Deny, Hope They Die’
NYC Taxi Medallions Sell for $1.1 Million
America Is a Tax Haven…and That’s a Very Good Thing
Minnesota City Settles After Cop Uses Mace On Deaf Motorist
Ohio: Mother-Daughter Speed Trap Team Face The Judge
Drug-sniffing Dogs and their Handlers
Fox News analyst: ‘Very high probability’ Iraq hid WMDs in Syria
Castro's Take on Gun-Control Coincides With Our Rulers'
Official Inflation Measure Shows Strongest Climb in More Than Three Years
How the Patriot Act debate became about library records instead of phone records
Marijuana Breath Test, Alternative To Controversial Blood Test For Pot?