
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Barter and Alternative Currencies Growing in Greece
The NSA's Secret Cops, Known as "Q Group," are Hunting Down Edward Snowden
Guerrilla surveillance camera destruction hits the U.S.
Apparently, Perjury Isn't a Crime When Police Commit It
Original owner of Toronto ex-mayor’s alleged ‘crack’ video may have been killed
Oklahoma man faces life in prison for selling legal Colorado marijuana
Belgium rejects France’s push to tax French citizens living in Belgium
Police now accompanying Smart Meter installations: Two homeowners arrested for saying NO
The Startling Reality of Money Power
Washington greets the New Year by assaulting your rights
Former Cheney aide demands Syria ‘exit strategy’ from Obama
Mission KS Police Take Down, Cavity Search Mom In Front Of Children
Washington cops working to ‘desensitize’ drug dogs to marijuana smell
Kanye West Unleashes Lawyers on ‘Coinye’ Altcoin
Beaufort County (NC) Calls For Gun Law Nullification And Constitutional Convention