“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Liberland: utopian tax-free micronation or state of mind?
Saxo Bank CEO Warns of Collapse Into “Totalitarian” Society
These free market services show just how inefficient your government is
The Most Complete Criminal Organization In Human History
Grandmother Struck and Killed by Drunk Driving NY Officer
TSA Will Stop Accepting Driver's Licenses From Nine States On Jan. 10
Ron Paul: For Normal Relations With Cuba, End US Interventionism
Deutsche Bank Stock Crashes After Fed "Secretly" Put It On "Troubled" Watchlist
Obama Berlin Speeches: 2008 vs 2013
S.F. SmartCar-Tippers Rage Against the Machine
Death From Above: Navy Drone Logo Features Grim Reaper
Depositing a Little Common Sense into the Law
U.S. Navy contractor traded inside data for hookers and Lady Gaga tickets
Local Television Beats the Internet?
Farming Experts Predict Food Safety Laws Will Destroy Local Foods Trend