“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Iran plans to phase out dollar, euro in foreign trade: Econ. min.
15 Percent of Malls To Close Due to Online Shopping?
Obama calls out encryption in terror strategy speech
Congress approves surveillance legislation tucked into budget package
Google confirms critical Android crypto flaw used in $5,700 Bitcoin heist
Gun Grabbers in History
Ballot initiative looks to save Los Angeles pot shops
Miss a Little … Miss a Lot
‘Rise of the Drones’ Is Mostly a PBS Infomercial for the Military Defense Industry
U.S. Drones Kill More Than 30 in Yemen; School Targeted in One Attack
TEDxMogadishu 2013 Theme: Rediscover
Colorado reps seek state exemption from federal pot prohibition laws
Minority Report: Fiction Has Become Reality
IRS Needs AR-15's For "Standoff Capabilities"?
Monthly Home Payment Soars 40% To 2008 Levels