
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Militarized Police: The Standing Army the Founders Warned About
A Bit Above The Rest
Rand Paul Issues 'Dear Colleague' Letter Opposing Syrian Intervention
Another California scheme to fleece motorists and eviscerate their rights
Why Are so Many Refugees Drowning? And Why Don't They Fly?
Mexico could legalize marijuana in five years: former president Vicente Fox
Court Rules Warrantless Cell Phone Tracking Violates Fourth Amendment
Iranian Electoral Candidate Disqualified for Being Too Attractive
Is Windows 8 a Trojan Horse for the NSA? The German Government Thinks So
Jacob Hornberger: Judicial Immunity for the Assassins
That 3D-Printed Handgun You've Been Waiting For Is Here
New Hong Kong Bitcoin Exchange Welcomes Mainland Customers
3D Printing Now Brings You Semiautomatic Pistols (To Scare Control Freaks)
How Khan Academy (Free) Transformed an Inner-City School
DoD Training Manual: ‘Extremist’ Founding Fathers ‘Would Not Be Welcome'