“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
(Visited 53 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Cop at Suspicionless Checkpoint Starts Barking Orders, But Then Flees from Camera
Learn Bobby Tay’s $2.7 Trillion Sigma Secret
A New Wireless Hack Can Unlock 100 Million Volkswagens
New FAA ruling effectively bans ridesharing for planes
Veteran’s Guns Confiscated After Forced ‘Psychiatric Evaluation’
Sealand to adopt bitcoin?
Jeffrey Tucker: Wall Street Discovers the Blockchain
Dzhokar Tsarnaev’s Throat Wound: Another Government Lie Bites the Dust
The Building Backlash of America’s Economically Forgotten
Don't Show Bernanke This Chart Of Gold Loans In India
Your right to resell your own stuff is in peril
How to Buy a Tesla with Bitcoins
The NSA Has All Non-Gun Show Sales in Its Files.
Bradley Manning and Freedom of the Press
Bitcoin's UK Future Looks Bleak