
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Why We're Not Sneering at the Averages
U.S. Admits No Imminent Threat from Syria, No Clear Evidence
Common Core Exams Put on Hold
17-year-old tased to death by Miami cops after spray-painting abandoned McDonald's
Illinois illegally seizes bees resistant to Roundup; kills remaining queens [2012]
Indiana Supreme Court Upholds Drug Stop For Legally Tinted Windows
Unit 731: How Japan’s Germ Warfare Unit Ended Up Working for the US
China Cutting Access to Overseas Crypto Trading
How to save 51 billion lives for 68 cents
Infographic: An Introduction to The Rise of Bitcoins
The Machine: The Truth Behind Teachers Unions
Wendy McElroy: A Vast Land Grab to Grouse About
Australian government forces citizens to answer intimate questions about sex partners or face jail t...
Cameron, While Trying to Ban Internet, Praises Lapdog Press
You may already be a winner in NSA’s “three-degrees” surveillance sweepstakes!