
“The technically savvy are on notice that they must be very careful about whom they deal with, since calculated ignorance of illegal activity is not an acceptable excuse. But at what point does a failure to be nosy edge into criminal conduct? The challenge for anyone who creates technology is to guess when, exactly, they should turn their back on paying customers. Take, for example, a manufacturer of robot kits for hobbyists. If someone uses those robots to patrol a smuggling route or help protect a meth lab so that traffickers can better evade law enforcement, how will prosecutors determine whether the company acted criminally?”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/03/alfred-anaya/all/
Related posts:
Former East German secret police captain says NSA spying ‘a dream come true’
Trump doesn’t want ISIS “using our Internet”
Target's Big Credit Card Hack Might Involve Even More Retailers
The Persecution of Rita Hutchens
Why Your Town Is Going Broke
S.F. Taxi Chief Resigns, Predicts Industry Wipeout By Lyft And Uber
Bitcoin’s Sixth Year Likely Driven By Institutional Participation
Free State Project Demands Apology For “Domestic Terrorism” Claims In Tank Grant Application
Get ready for Washington’s “Automatic IRAs”
Senators want to ban Russian Banks from the United States over Syria
Overstock.com to Open Exchange for Legal Crypto-Asset Trading
Cryptocurrency Payment Processor GoCoin Gets $1.5m in Funding
5 ways fiat currency is fighting back against bitcoin
Interview with Austin and Beccy of 'Life on Bitcoin' in Singapore
How The Pirate Bay Plans to Beat Censorship For Good