“For one state to respond to another state’s military aggression by killing, or threatening to kill, its civilian population is monstrous. And if it’s monstrous, it’s monstrous when anyone does it. It would also be monstrous if some purely hypothetical country, the only country in the world with atomic weapons, used them to kill several hundred thousand civilians in two Japanese cities. It would be monstrous if some purely hypothetical country with hundreds of long-range bombers had had, as its official military policy, making first use of nuclear weapons and hitting every major population center in the USSR in retaliation for a conventional incursion into Western Europe.”
Related posts:
Trump's North Korea blockade threat amounts to illegal starvation
Chemical Agents in Bombs
France’s answer to terrorism: The Law of Suspects
What Happens After the Housing Bubble Reflates?
Why Doesn't Outrage At U.S. Imprisoning Children Extend To U.S. Killing Children?
California Crashing
The President Punts in the Syrian War Game
Peter Schiff: The real fiscal cliff
Is Cyprus a New Energy Battleground?
Phoenix Woman Ordered to Not Give Out Water in 112 Degree Heat Because She Lacked a Permit
Peter Schiff: The Inevitable Collapse
Ignorance, Intelligence, and War-making
Egyptian nightmare for Erdogan
Bill Bonner: Revolving Zombies
Jim Rogers: Need to own real assets in India
