“For one state to respond to another state’s military aggression by killing, or threatening to kill, its civilian population is monstrous. And if it’s monstrous, it’s monstrous when anyone does it. It would also be monstrous if some purely hypothetical country, the only country in the world with atomic weapons, used them to kill several hundred thousand civilians in two Japanese cities. It would be monstrous if some purely hypothetical country with hundreds of long-range bombers had had, as its official military policy, making first use of nuclear weapons and hitting every major population center in the USSR in retaliation for a conventional incursion into Western Europe.”
Related posts:
Is it time to get rid of the DEA?
"State Control": What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About
Trump's North Korea blockade threat amounts to illegal starvation
Why You Hear Nothing About The West, Texas Firefighters
Bill Bonner: Why Democrats are Plotting Against Obamacare
Ron Paul: Congress, Drones and The Imperial Presidency
Be on the Lookout: Amazon Turns its Gaze to Surveillance
U.S. States Protect, Subsidize Bitcoin While Feds Moan About 'Terrorism' And 'Illicit Activity'
Robert Ringer: Why Slavery Is Here to Stay
The Return of the Dodgy Dossier
Obama admin. sends guns to Syria…without background checks
Dennis Rodman (& Russia) Promoting Global Peace
A War On Opioids Is A War On Suffering People
Omnipotent Government, Not Trump, Is the Problem
U.S. v. Microsoft: It’s the right to privacy, stupid
