“Although the mechanics of fractional-reserve banking have not changed in 300 years the public’s expectations have evidently changed greatly. Today banks are expected to lend ever more generously while depositors are supposed to not incur any risk of loss at all. State deposit ‘insurance’ is not insurance. Insurance companies calculate and calibrate risks, charge the insured party and set aside capital for when the insured event occurs. A state deposit ‘guarantee’ is simply another unfunded government promise, extended in the hope that things won’t get that bad. When they finally do the state does what it always does: it will take from Peter to pay Paul.”
http://detlevschlichter.com/2013/03/good-riddance-to-deposit-insurance/
(Visited 39 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Revolutionary France’s Road to Hyperinflation
“Cruel and Unusual” Is the Only Way to Describe It
Obamacare will hurt young people most
How to Spot a Market Top
Voters Interviewed at Gun Point, Realize the Shocking Facts of Their Political Views
Trace Mayer on Bitcoin Investments
Obamacare and the New Soviet Man
The State, Not Manning, is the Criminal
The Future of the Web Looks a Lot Like Bitcoin
Rand Paul: Is 1984 Now?
Why the Resource Supercycle Is Still Intact
Robert Wenzel: An Examination of Key Factors in the Collapse of the Soviet Union
How The USA Captures Whistleblowers And Other Political Enemies
Obamachow: Is National Food Insurance The Next Big Idea?
Hold US Policymakers to Their Abysmal Record on Foreign Meddling