
“The thing that Rich is counting on to stop the hammer from falling—and reward him for standing up for his why-can’t-I-sell-some-fucking-pot-to-my-friends principles—isn’t a traditional legal argument. It’s pretty much assumed that Rich did technically break the (unjust) law by selling weed. What he’s banking on is that the jury will ‘nullify’ his case—in other words, they’ll come to the conclusion that the statutes he violated shouldn’t exist in the first place and there’s no reason to send him to jail. That’s not such a far-fetched idea.”
http://www.vice.com/read/eighty-one-years-for-weed
Related posts:
Alcatel-Lucent files Patent for Vault to Wallet Transfer System
Beginning of the End for the Kirchner Era
CyanogenMod Android firmware gains built-in SMS encryption
How the System Treats a Good Cop
The history of the requirement that U.S. citizens use U.S. passports to travel
We're All Iraqis Now
LA Times: Only An Incipient "Terrorist" Denounces State Murder
Students defend professor after sit-in over racial climate
Louisiana Health Dept.: Homeless Can’t Eat Deer Meat
We’re Locking Up Fewer Black People and More White People
The Lifespan of Storage Media
Jeff Berwick: Bitcoin Is Equivalent to the Internet in 1993
The Man Who Lost $2 Million an Hour!
RFID tracking armbands forced on all residents near California music festival
A patent on watching ads online? No problem, says top patent court