
“The thing that Rich is counting on to stop the hammer from falling—and reward him for standing up for his why-can’t-I-sell-some-fucking-pot-to-my-friends principles—isn’t a traditional legal argument. It’s pretty much assumed that Rich did technically break the (unjust) law by selling weed. What he’s banking on is that the jury will ‘nullify’ his case—in other words, they’ll come to the conclusion that the statutes he violated shouldn’t exist in the first place and there’s no reason to send him to jail. That’s not such a far-fetched idea.”
http://www.vice.com/read/eighty-one-years-for-weed
Related posts:
For Police, Murder is a Time-Saving Device
Uncle Sam’s Marijuana Patch
Son of ex-American abroad: 'It’s like watching a house on fire'
Disturbing Trend of Police Wanting Drones for Routine Infractions
Seasteading: Entrepreneurship in Government on the High Seas
MSNBC Blames Boston Bombing on “Deeply Racist” Alex Jones
Grid Down Acapulco: “There’s Nothing to Eat”
Pat Buchanan: What Is America’s Mission Now?
Second Michigan county says “NO!” to federal NDAA kidnapping
NY Fed: The Truth About the Job Market for Recent College Graduates
Obama Budget Contains Middle Class Income Tax Hike
Cracked.com Serving Malware in Drive-By Downloads
The Arbitrary Diktats of Generalissimo Obama
What Is Bitcoin? Tom Woods Talks to Erik Voorhees
Paypal freezes $45,000 of Mailpile’s crowdfunded dollars