
“The thing that Rich is counting on to stop the hammer from falling—and reward him for standing up for his why-can’t-I-sell-some-fucking-pot-to-my-friends principles—isn’t a traditional legal argument. It’s pretty much assumed that Rich did technically break the (unjust) law by selling weed. What he’s banking on is that the jury will ‘nullify’ his case—in other words, they’ll come to the conclusion that the statutes he violated shouldn’t exist in the first place and there’s no reason to send him to jail. That’s not such a far-fetched idea.”
http://www.vice.com/read/eighty-one-years-for-weed
Related posts:
RFID tracking armbands forced on all residents near California music festival
Oil and the ISIS: Another US-NATO War on Libya is Imminent
Reports: Speeding Not A Cause Of Child Accidents
Government's New Regulation That Screws Corporate Pensioners
More Dangerous Than Iran?
Match.com Founder: Fed Spyware Searching For Bitcoin Wallets
The Hyperloop: Elon Musk’s futuristic plan to blast Californians through a tube
US Small Business Owners' Hiring Intent Plunges to 2008 Lows
Treasury Caught Illegally Spying On Americans’ Financial Records
Psychedelic Science: Magic Mushrooms
Top 10 gold miners: cash cost reporting comes home to roost
The Retention of Wealth
Part-Time Employment as a Share of Total Employment
Getting Up-to-date on Syria
When the State Floods the Zone, Reform Is Dead