“The thing that Rich is counting on to stop the hammer from falling—and reward him for standing up for his why-can’t-I-sell-some-fucking-pot-to-my-friends principles—isn’t a traditional legal argument. It’s pretty much assumed that Rich did technically break the (unjust) law by selling weed. What he’s banking on is that the jury will ‘nullify’ his case—in other words, they’ll come to the conclusion that the statutes he violated shouldn’t exist in the first place and there’s no reason to send him to jail. That’s not such a far-fetched idea.”
http://www.vice.com/read/eighty-one-years-for-weed
Related posts:
The Future of Money - Trace Mayer at Inside Bitcoins 2013 Las Vegas
The Role Disability Insurance is Playing in Discouraging Young Adults from Working
How to Make $15.6 Million, Risk-Free
Marijuana: The Next Diabetes Drug?
Copyright Becomes a Parody of Itself: Art History Textbook Contains No Actual Art
Will the Congressional Budget Hurt People in Your Name?
State Dept. admits passport form was illegal, but still wants it approved
Dream Chaser flight a 'success' despite gear failure
Court orders NYPD to pay $360,000 for raid that destroyed Occupy Wall Street library
The FED Does Not Control the Federal Funds Rate
Africa Rising: The Military-Industrial Complex Gets to Work
Uruguay: Decline of the Green Revolution and the Future of Farming
Ecuador: Is it nuts to invest here?
Have a Gmail Account? Want to See what NSA 'Metadata' Really Means?
Snowden’s Email Provider Shuts Down