
“Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who filibustered for 13 hours in March 2013 against the idea of using military drone technology against U.S. citizens, said he supported them being used against criminal suspects in an interview with Fox Business Channel on Monday. ‘I have never argued against any technology being used against having an imminent threat, [or] an act of crime going on,’ Paul said, referring to Boston Marathon bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. ‘If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.'”
Related posts:
Latest War is a Defense Bureaucrat’s Wet Dream
Watch As City Changes Parking Signs Then Issues Tickets To Cars That Had Been Parked Legally
Thieves dig 50-foot tunnel to steal money from a grocery store ATM
Challenging a Long-Held Assumption about Commodities
New Chinese law reinforces government control of cyberspace
Internal Revenue Code severely punishes (other) countries which impose extraterritorial taxation
Equifax comes clean that it lost thousands of users' passports too
House unexpectedly votes to stop warrantless NSA searches
Universities to MOOCs: We Will Assimilate You
How can anyone trust banks?
Stolen Air Force drone manuals available for $200 on the dark web
Another Bitcoin exchange implodes: Vircurex freezes accounts
Report Predicts Increase in Sales of Private Greek Islands
The French National Sport Is Taxation, not Soccer
Entire School District Shuts Down — Out of Money