“In Libya, the media has gotten side tracked on a potentially sensational Obama administration cover up—no matter how minor—instead of asking the more important questions: ‘Would U.S. diplomats have been killed if the United States had not overthrown Muammar Gaddafi and destabilized Libya?’ or ‘Did the U.S. military intervention destabilize the entire region by unleashing Gaddafi’s huge weapon stocks and fighters into places like Mali?’ Bloodthirsty Republicans, such as John McCain and Lindsay Graham, don’t want to ask these questions, because it would undermine the rationale for their zealous advocacy of an ill-advised American intervention in Libya.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=3617
Related posts:
Freedom Requires Whistleblowers: The Importance of Transparency
Ron Paul: Let Market Forces Solve Organ Transplant Crisis
The Wacoization of Chris Dorner
Drones, Assassinations, and the Drug War
Ron Paul: Against Neocon Domination
You Don’t Need a Weatherman to Know Which Way the Wind Blows
Do Citizens Have the Responsibility to Protect the Police?
The Blunt Truth about The Trayvon Martin Case
American Exceptionalism: Putin, the Neocons, and Ron Paul
London Tube strike: Sack the drivers, and roll out the robots
How Bad Is The Surveillance State?
Bill Bonner: Goodbye, Motor City
Why Is My US Brokerage Firm Closing My Account?
Bill Bonner: Why the “Shutdown” Critics Have It All Wrong…
The United States Should Quit Meddling in Egypt
