“In Libya, the media has gotten side tracked on a potentially sensational Obama administration cover up—no matter how minor—instead of asking the more important questions: ‘Would U.S. diplomats have been killed if the United States had not overthrown Muammar Gaddafi and destabilized Libya?’ or ‘Did the U.S. military intervention destabilize the entire region by unleashing Gaddafi’s huge weapon stocks and fighters into places like Mali?’ Bloodthirsty Republicans, such as John McCain and Lindsay Graham, don’t want to ask these questions, because it would undermine the rationale for their zealous advocacy of an ill-advised American intervention in Libya.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=3617
Related posts:
Napolitano: Obama’s remedy for embarrassment nothing but tough talk
Ron Paul, The New Militarism: Who Profits?
What Do Americans Know That Their Government Doesn’t Know?
Bill Bonner: America’s faith-based economy
What Was the Point of Regime Change in Iraq?
Jacob Hornberger: Regime Change is the Root of Evil in Syria
Welcome to the Real World
Krugman: Germany Needs a Bubble To Save the Euro
Short Circuiting The Market
Two Cheers for the Coming Collapse of the U.S. Economy!
Ron Paul: Obama Has No Middle East Strategy? Good!
Jeffrey Tucker: The Great Deficit Ruse
US Falls Apart, Stock Market Booms?
The viral skinnydipping scandal, and the real story
Jim Rogers ... Sign of the Times?