“There are no vital national interests at stake in Syria. None. Not Iran, not Israel and not oil. Yes, we can watch from the sidelines and let the Iranians and Syrians form their own politics. This is what the U.S. did with Mexico and Canada. Did the U.S. relish interference from Spain, France, Great Britain and Russia into its affairs? How brainless is it to act as if the refugee crisis is an independent reason for intervening, when it is an outcome of the war itself, encouraged every step of the way by the U.S.? And why must the U.S. rectify this tragedy? What good is a ‘freedom’ that marches us off to wars willy-nilly or grabs our wealth to do what it wills?”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/138136.html
Related posts:
Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda link allegations - 2008 Pentagon report
The Basket Case Sometimes Known as Japan
The Fox (Monsanto) Buys the Chicken Coop (Beeologics)
Ron Paul: Attack Venezuela? Trump Can't be Serious!
California’s Economic Suicide and other News from Yesterday’s Ballot Measures
Beware the man on the white horse…
Why Doesn't Outrage At U.S. Imprisoning Children Extend To U.S. Killing Children?
Enslaving People to Keep Them Safe from Government-Produced Enemies
Congrats grads! That’ll be $29,400
Lance Armstrong and Kim Dotcom ... Guilty Until Proven Innocent?
Tax jurisdiction: Is space the final frontier?
Solving the Detroit Crisis
How Will You Deal With $10 a Gallon Gas?
Presstitutes Lie Through Their Teeth About House Intelligence Committee Report
After 50 Years, Washington Has Lost the War on Poverty