
“The Electronic Frontier Foundation started fighting against the Ultramercial patent in 2011, filing a brief with the appeals court stating that ‘[m]erely filing a patent application covering an idea that takes place on the Internet (especially without explaining any of the programming steps) does not somehow make an abstract idea (which is unpatentable) somehow not abstract (so it is patentable).’ In its reaction to the ruling Friday, the EFF said, ‘It’s time for the Supreme Court to step in and tell the Federal Circuit once and for all that abstract ideas—such as a process for viewing ads before accessing copyrighted content—are unpatentable.'”
Related posts:
Audacious Hack Exposes Bush Family Pix, E-Mail, Clinton Friendship
Caging Children, Separating Families: The War on Immigration Has Gone Too Far
'Don't Email Me; Call Me, or I Won't Do My Job', Says Lawmaker
Protesters rally in support of anti-bank chalk activist facing 13 years
Ron Paul: Defending the NSA means embracing ‘dictatorship’
Desperate Police Departments Ditch Hiring Standards
Loews, Homeland Security Promote 'Trusted Traveler'
BitPay Partners with 3dcart, Giving 16,000 Online Merchants the Ability to Accept Bitcoin
Gold replaces narcotics as the most valued smuggled item in India
NYPD Seized an Innocent Man's Cash, Used It to Pad Their Pensions
Venezuela Moves to Nationalize Food, Ration Medicine, Kill Comedy
How New Tax Cuts Are "Fighting for $15"
Will the Congressional Budget Hurt People in Your Name?
Venezuela Tackles Economic Crisis by Deleting 3 Zeros From its Currency
Brock Pierce on Bitcoin's Potential