
“The Electronic Frontier Foundation started fighting against the Ultramercial patent in 2011, filing a brief with the appeals court stating that ‘[m]erely filing a patent application covering an idea that takes place on the Internet (especially without explaining any of the programming steps) does not somehow make an abstract idea (which is unpatentable) somehow not abstract (so it is patentable).’ In its reaction to the ruling Friday, the EFF said, ‘It’s time for the Supreme Court to step in and tell the Federal Circuit once and for all that abstract ideas—such as a process for viewing ads before accessing copyrighted content—are unpatentable.'”
Related posts:
Cannabis For Infant's Brain Tumor, Doctor Calls Child "A Miracle Baby"
A Government Database about our Sex Lives: Gee, What Could Go Wrong?
Should Detroit’s Bankruptcy Be an Early-Warning Sign for Washington?
Burning Up the West: Feds, Greens Cause Catastrophic Fires
France Moves To Ban Free Drink Refills
Microsoft ordered to hand over US customer e-mails stored abroad
Kansas Prosecutor Defeated by Glaring Stupidity of Pot Laws
U.K. police hope to sniff out pot growers with marijuana-scented cards
New Poll: 57 Percent of Americans Think Obama's Assassination Program Is Unconstitutional
Calls to Congress 499 to 1 against Syria war
The Millions Killed in America’s Post-9/11 Wars – Part One: Iraq
Gaza Toy Blockade Preserved
Why business is leaving California for Texas
California pushes 350-foot no-fly drone law; government exempt
David Stockman: Lunatic Fed Engineering Global Collapse