
“The Electronic Frontier Foundation started fighting against the Ultramercial patent in 2011, filing a brief with the appeals court stating that ‘[m]erely filing a patent application covering an idea that takes place on the Internet (especially without explaining any of the programming steps) does not somehow make an abstract idea (which is unpatentable) somehow not abstract (so it is patentable).’ In its reaction to the ruling Friday, the EFF said, ‘It’s time for the Supreme Court to step in and tell the Federal Circuit once and for all that abstract ideas—such as a process for viewing ads before accessing copyrighted content—are unpatentable.'”
Related posts:
Supreme Court Rules that Citizens Can Hold Federal Government Liable for Abuse by Law Enforcement Of...
George Soros Takes a Giant Put Position Against the S&P 500
Worst. Retirement. Option. Ever.
Epic investor debate featuring faceoff between Peter Schiff and John Mauldin
The Empire’s Next Effort to Extract Your Wealth
How the US spends 26% of available tax revenue just to pay interest
Maybe We'll Reduce the NYPD to Firing Spitballs!
TSA Officials Agree to Training Program for Police on Travelers’ First and Fourth Amendment Rights
Texas: Court Finds Breath Mints Are Evidence Of DUI
Critical crypto bug exposes Yahoo Mail, other passwords
Windows 10: keylogging, harvesting browser history, purchases, and covert listening
'Economist': Europe's Politicians Need to Tame the 'Net Reformation
Marc Faber: Bond Burglars to Bring Bears Out of Hibernation
Homeschool raid on family viewed as terror
"Miracle" Cannabis Oil May Treat Cancer, But Money and the Law Stand in the Way of Finding Out