
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
The Twinkie, a Suicide
Honduras police seize $50,000 gold-plated AK-47 rifle
New Travel Accessory for Beijing: Gas Masks
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to begin merging operations
Mexican politician shot dead minutes after promising to crack down on violent crime
Fears of NSA surveillance hurting the U.S. cloud computing industry
China and Russia Lay Foundation for Massive Economic Cooperation
LAPD takes another step toward deploying drones domestically
France 'totally bankrupt', says labour minister Michel Sapin
Protesters banned from tax title auction; 1 man arrested for using video camera
12-year-old boy discovers impressive 5.16 carat diamond after digging for 10 minutes
Trump urges Congress to restrict Chinese investment in U.S. tech companies
FL Highway Patrol Trooper arrested for fabricating arrest reports
New Gold Import Tax In Sri Lanka
Pentagon puts 650,000 workers on unpaid leave due to cuts