
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
Shiller: Housing Market May Have Further to Drop
Record-High 42% of Americans Identify as Independents
FTC Settles Google Antitrust Investigation
Cop shoots elderly man after mistaking cane for gun
India raises import duty on gold, silver to 10 per cent
Alcoholics who use marijuana have lower risk of liver disease, study finds
Chinese ‘re-education’ labor camps set for abolition
Jogger imprisoned for 2 weeks after accidentally entering U.S.
Fmr. NSA chief: ‘Morally arrogant’ Snowden will probably become alcoholic
$1.3 billion flowing through 2012 presidential race
FinCEN Publishes Rulings on Virtual Currency Miners and Investors
Norway Gets U.S. Help Chasing Citizens Dodging Income Taxes
Will Obama Bailout Crony Sugar Processors?
Indian government seeks gold purchase information from jewellers
Detroit Cops Arrested For Robbing Drivers At Gunpoint