
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
Seymour Hersh on bin Laden death: ‘One big lie, not one word of it is true’
NYPD To Launch All-Seeing System To Track Crime
Federal officials stole $1M in bitcoins from Silk Road while investigating it
McGruff, The Crime Dog, Sentenced To 16 Years For Pot, Weapons
IRS Deputy Won’t Testify Before Congress on Awards to Friend
More Fidelity markdowns: Valuations slashed on Zenefits, Blue Bottle Coffee, others
What’s Inside America’s Banks?
Russia evacuates citizens in Syria ahead of military strikes in the 'next few days'
MSCI backs itself into corner on China share inclusion into global index
Native tribes debate entering legal pot business
Israeli intelligence 'intercepted Syrian regime talk about chemical attack'
Bitcoin Downloads Surge in Argentina
Want to see how America is changing? Property taxes hold the answer
Prodi: Germany should seize opportunity to re-conquer Europe
ECB Said to Consider Minus 0.1 Percent Deposit Rate