“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
(Visited 23 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Is There Hope for Recent College Grads?
Growing number of educators boycott standardized tests
In Legal Showdown Over Marijuana, Oakland Dispensary Takes Leading Role
Rand Paul: Syria lacks security connection
U.S. says it doesn’t believe in ‘diplomatic asylum’ despite having offered it in the past
In U.S., Perceived Need for Third Party Reaches New High
Hedge Funds Gear Up for Another Big Short: High-Yield Bonds
Pentagon to end exclusive deal with RIM’s Blackberry
Las Vegas casinos adopt new form of currency: Bitcoins
G8 to clamp down on tax avoidance
Spanish Pension Raids Spell Bad News for Bond Sales
IRS official knew in 2011 of 'Tea Party' targeting: watchdog report
U.S. levies sanctions on Iranian petrochemical industry
Seven killed, hundreds injured in new round of dueling protests in Egypt
India Department of Post to stop gold coin sales