“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
California death penalty ruled unconstitutional
Germany lends real value to bitcoin virtual money
Robbers posing as police steal $261,000 from Saudi government official
FATCA: The end of financial privacy
Women join ranks of Assad’s new paramilitary force in Syria
Two Colorado lawmakers lose recall elections over support for gun laws
How your data is used by police, and where it goes wrong
Federal judge blocks indefinite detention law
Widespread placebo prescriptions prompt debate over the ethics of overmedication
BMW takes ‘great leap forward’ into electric car market
Half of Affordable Care Act call center jobs will be part-time
U.S. to let spy agencies scour Americans' finances
Americans Abroad Stranded as US Check Clearance Blocked
Obama promises he won’t ‘scramble jets’ to get Snowden
Looking for Hashish in Cairo? Talk to the Police