
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
How The Hungarian Disease Is Spreading Across Central Europe
Feds Searching Record Number of Our Personal Devices at the Border
Google Lets Slip That It's Exploring Possible Bitcoin Integration Plans
St. Louis residents became aware of Army nuclear waste dumping via HBO doc
Oklahoma state legislator introduces bill to banish NSA
Nasty Gal: From eBay To Multimillion-Dollar Company In Seven Years
Bradley Manning’s Letter To President Obama Requesting Pardon
California Democrats' blueprint for the election: 'Go left'
Russia halts rocket exports to US, hitting space and military programmes
Portuguese court orders rehiring of drunk ‘happy worker’ garbage collectors
500,000 Indian workers lose jobs as jewellers curb gold imports
Speed trap city facing dissolution after mayor caught selling drugs
New phone app would let you snitch on illegal parkers, get a cut of the fine
San Diego Mayor Bob Filner Urges ‘Jury Nullification’ In Medical Pot Dispensary Case
New space race: Putin unveils $50 billion drive for Russian supremacy