
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
Indianapolis "Officer of the Year" attacks man in under 16 seconds of conversation
Nicaragua, Venezuela willing to take in Edward Snowden
Russian Stocks Now Cheaper Than Ever as Oil Rout Deepens
U.S. Deal With JPMorgan Followed a Crucial Call To Justice Department
Mexican town finds more security by throwing out the police
Snap up a pint in Britain's first Bitcoin pub
Forget cursive: Teach kids how to code
Myanmar says it ends decades of media censorship
TSA officer hits six colleagues after mistaking pepper spray for laser pointer
Germans Hide Cash in Diapers as Swiss Secrecy Crumbles
Bitcoin start-up nabs Goldman board member
Why is Gibraltar a British territory?
Missouri Republican Wants To Make It A Felony For His Fellow Lawmakers To Propose Gun Laws
US, EU kick off Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership talks despite Snowden revelations
CNBC: So Gold Crashed. Now What?