
“The Supreme Court said a Florida property owner may be owed compensation from a government agency that refused to award him a development permit for his land. The legal issue was whether the agency’s action constituted a ‘taking’ subject to compensation, under the so-called takings clause of the Fifth Amendment, in a more than 18-year battle by Koontz and his late father over their nearly 15-acre parcel of land. After Florida designated much of the parcel as protected wetlands, Koontz proposed to develop about a quarter of it and dedicate the rest for conservation, only to have local officials insist that he pay money to protect wetlands elsewhere.”
Related posts:
China Banks Boost Precious Metals Hoard Amid Lease Demand
Medical marijuana rally slated for Oklahoma Capitol Wednesday
Chinese Way of Doing Business: In Cash We Trust
The 20 hottest real estate spots in the world
Brazil threatens to take claims of U.S. spying to the U.N.
Half of All Homes Are Being Purchased With Cash
France adds Jersey, Bermuda to tax-haven blacklist
Lost jet skier wanders through JFK airport security
Wheelchair-bound man files lawsuit after police beat, pepper spray him
Bank of Cyprus converts portion of uninsured savings to equity
100 Bitcoin ATMs will arrive in Spain in the next three months
Every Georgia driver who refuses to blow is strapped to a table, put in a headlock, blood forcibly t...
Never Mind $35, The World's Cheapest Oil Is Already Close to $20
Kenya to Introduce Exchange-Traded Funds, Market Regulator Says
Ex-U.S. officials hail Japan's decision on collective self-defense