
“The suppression of feedback only dams up risks and imbalances: out of sight, out of mind. But the imbalances haven’t vanished; they’re piling up unseen in the system, where they eventually break out at the system’s weakest point. Central-planning manipulation ‘works’ by closing all the safety valves of market feedback, creating a dangerous but politically appealing illusion of stability and ‘growth.’ But the consequences of removing or suppressing feedback are catastrophic longer term, as the imbalances and risks pile up unseen until they bring down the entire system.”
http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2013/06/why-suppressing-feedback-leads-to.html
Related posts:
Paul Craig Roberts: Washington Drives the World Toward War
Ten Ways to Reduce Terrorism - Can We Admit The War On Terror Has Failed?
Cui Bono Fed: Who Benefits from the Federal Reserve?
Police Militarization: The New Search and Seizure
Casey's Louis James Warns: 'Don't Try to Time the Market'
Bill Bonner: Promises Will Be Broken
Neocon think tank next to call out racist, pro-war roots of War on Drugs
Publishing Atrocity: The 1963 Edition of Human Action
James Corbett: The State is Not Great
Government's Spirit-Crushing Hatred Of Lemonade
All I Want For Christmas Is the End to Unnecessary War
Is The Everything Bubble Ready to Pop?
How to Be a YouTube Star and Beat Justin Timberlake in the Charts
Senior Italian parliament economist on Ludwig von Mises and the current economic crisis
Downside Resilience, Anyone?