“Isn’t it shocking that Obama has threatened to change American policy just because Karzai is being difficult? Should a policy that allegedly has fulfilled US vital security interests be drastically altered because of mere personal animosity? Yet we have been down this erratic policy road before. The Obama administration argued that keeping a residual postwar US military force in Iraq was vitally necessary, only to nix a settlement when the Iraqi government refused to exempt US soldiers from Iraqi law in the event they committed crimes—a rather imperial request to say the least. We can thus surmise that perhaps such residual occupation forces were never very vital to US security.”
http://www.independent.org/newsroom/article.asp?id=4664
Related posts:
Chinese Women Aren’t Taking Buffett’s Advice on Gold
Telegraphing the Turnaround in Gold
Bill Bonner: Sell the House, Sell the Car, Sell the Kids…
No Rose Can Mask the Stench of Obama's Tyranny
Bill Bonner: The Fed Can’t Stop What’s Coming
The Strange Moral Compass of Christopher Dorner
James Bovard: Washington secrecy is creating a know-nothing democracy
Ron Paul: Our Soldiers Kill Innocent Little Kids and Then Commit Suicide
Ron Paul, The New Militarism: Who Profits?
Abolish ICE
Andrew Napolitano: Domestic Spying Is Dangerous to Freedom
Bill Bonner: How to Invest Like the Swiss
Peter Schiff: Cyprus Lifts the Curtain
Bill Bonner: The Housing Rebound Story Is a Fraud
Peter Schiff: What Doesn't Kill Gold Makes It Stronger
