“Debate raged in the press and the streets. For supporters of the ‘Banner,’ the song was the perfect symbol of national feeling, and anyone who disagreed might not be patriotic. The Veterans of Foreign Wars organized an Americanization committee that promoted the song as a litmus test of loyalty. Critics of the ‘Banner’ found their patriotism questioned. Stetson was investigated, subpoenaed, and forced to testify in March 1924 about the source of her funds. No, she had not been funded by foreigners, she said. She had spent $16,000 of her own money on newspaper, and she would spend more. She took out anti-“Banner” ads in March 1924 and August 1925.”
Related posts:
The Fed's Asset-Inflation Machine
The Liefare-Warfare State: A History Of U.S. False Flag Events
Money Down a Rathole: College, Healthcare, Housing
Obamacare will hurt young people most
Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools [2011]
Is Your Out-of-State LLC “Doing Business” in California?
Scheuer: Ten questions worth pondering on Obama, Syria, and Interventionism
The Endgame of State/Local Government Pensions
Elite Description Problem - Why the System Needs a Full Explanation
FATCA, GATCA and the Changing Investment Scene, Worldwide
Tyler Winklevoss: Digital Darwinism
Tragedy of the Commons and Species Extinction
The Dorm Boom: Higher Education’s Fellow Traveler
A New Yorker's view of gun control
The New Deal Origins of Fannie Mae and the Government-Housing Complex