“‘People who hold controversial views – whether it’s about gun ownership policies, drug legalization, or immigration – often must express views as a group in order to act and advocate effectively,’ said Cohn. ‘But fear of individual exposure when participating in political debates over high-stakes issues can dissuade people from taking part. That’s why the Supreme Court ruled in 1958 that membership lists of groups have strong First Amendment protection. Telephone records, especially complete records collected over many years, are even more invasive than membership lists, since they show casual or repeated inquiries as well as full membership.'”
Related posts:
Bitcoin ATM Company Refused Account by Bank of Ireland
Bill Bonner: Funny Money Is Getting Funnier
Grand Jury Rejects Indictment of Teen Arrested for Rap Lyrics
Cops Can Track Cellphones Without Warrants, Federal Appeals Court Rules
More Jawboning from Australia’s Central Bank
Handcuffed and Helpless
Farm Fresh Food with Bitcoin - La Nay Ferme help Beccy & Austin eat!
BitPay, Toshiba Partnership Will Bring Bitcoin to 6,000 New Merchants
Blockchain.info: the World’s Most Popular Bitcoin Website and Wallet
Puppies & Kittens & Censors...Oh my! Government Muzzles Internet Pet Veterinarian
State-Run Single-Payer Health Care: Prohibitively Expensive—and Illegal?
Congressman Holt pushes to abolish Patriot Act he voted for in 2001
The Military Industrial Complex Will Bankrupt America
Mortgage Rates Are at Their Highest Levels in Two Years
Penning the Sheep for a Shearing—Capital Controls, Part 2