
“We’ve ruled out the AUMF. The Executive Order cited above hasn’t been rescinded. And no one can cite any changes in the laws governing assassination. But clearly, something has changed. And if the law hasn’t changed, then it must necessarily be that those laws have been reinterpreted to mean something they didn’t mean before. The question becomes – who reinterpreted them and by what authority did they do so? The answer to the first half of that question is easy – the unelected lawyers acting on behalf of the Bush and Obama administrations reinterpreted them. The second part is more difficult.”
Related posts:
North Carolina Court To Decide Whether Firemen Can Perform Traffic Stops
Japanese Police Shut Down Protest at Mt. Gox
FBI Claims RT Founder Beat Himself To Death In His Hotel Room In 2015
The Military Industrial Complex Will Bankrupt America
The Origin of Gun Control in America in 30 Seconds
Malaysian Central Bank Has No Plans To Regulate Bitcoin
8-year-old suspended from Florida school for playing cops and robbers
Woman violently arrested for playing banjo in wrong place at Syria war protest
Rahmaland Cigarette Tax Increases by $1 a Pack
Why the US debt crisis didn’t affect bitcoin
Obamacare Cost Me Full-Time Work
Moneero Turns World's 6.8 Billion Cell Phones into Mobile Cash Wallets
ACLU security expert: post-9/11 security measures show ‘we took a wrong turn’
MassGOP Chair Bob Maginn and former Congressmen could face jailtime for political and financial corr...
Internment Camps: U. S. Government Field Manual