
“We’ve ruled out the AUMF. The Executive Order cited above hasn’t been rescinded. And no one can cite any changes in the laws governing assassination. But clearly, something has changed. And if the law hasn’t changed, then it must necessarily be that those laws have been reinterpreted to mean something they didn’t mean before. The question becomes – who reinterpreted them and by what authority did they do so? The answer to the first half of that question is easy – the unelected lawyers acting on behalf of the Bush and Obama administrations reinterpreted them. The second part is more difficult.”
Related posts:
NetUSB Driver Flaw Exposes Millions of Routers to Hacking
Beef Prices Set New Record Highs
First Major Success in Lawsuit Challenging New Colorado Gun Control Laws
French Anti-Uber Protest: Cabbies Burn Cars, Attack Uber Drivers
In Nearly Half the U.S., Marijuana Arrests Have Gone Up Since 2014
The Michael Hastings Wreck: Video Evidence Only Deepens The Mystery
Silk Road fallout: Two sites rise to become the next 'eBay of drugs'
HSBC Whistleblower Speaks, Uncovered Terrorist Financing
Texas proposes one of nation’s “most sweeping” mobile privacy laws
Swiss socialist politician asks government to create report on bitcoin
420,000 People Say Adiós to Spain
Florida education chief resigns after fixing charter school grades for GOP donor
Florida man cites ‘Bush doctrine’ after pre-emptive killing of neighbors
Special Report: Insiders on Why Bitcoin's Future Is Bright
IRS Now Has a Tool to Spy On Bitcoin Users