
“The ACA could actually cause the number of our covered employees to decrease, particularly in the first year. The penalty for declining coverage will be low compared with the cost of coverage; and employees will know that if they happen to get sick, they can get insurance after that. So the economically rational decision for young people, like our crew employees, is to pay the penalty and forego the insurance. Despite what the government may believe, our employees are smart enough to figure this out. For insurers, it’s simple math: Premiums collected must exceed claims paid. If too few young healthy people enroll, insurers will raise premiums on those who do.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323309404578613653344566068.html
Related posts:
ICANN: How top-down ‘implementation’ replaced bottom-up policymaking
Why Oil Could Move Higher--Much Higher
Why College Football Will Be Dead Within 20 Years
Elite Description Problem - Why the System Needs a Full Explanation
Thin Wire - Hawala
The Truth About SwedenCare
Hayek to Satoshi and Beyond
Austrian Theory Explains and Exposes Booms and Bubbles
John Hussman: The Two Pillars of Full-Cycle Investing
When the FDA Declared War on a Texas AIDS Patient
India’s Gold Mania
The American Hiring Paradigm Is Broken
Top 10 Reasons Why the Mafia is Better than the State
Will Warrants for Searches Become a Thing of the Past?
Dr. Grinspoon's Kind War: Interview With a Renegade Marijuana Proponent