“An oil spill is 34 times more likely with a railway accident compared to just the aging pipeline infrastructure. So why then are we relying more and more on rail transports? The answer is simple: there is simply too much uninformed opposition to building new pipelines and replace the aging infrastructure criss-crossing North America. But the fact of the matter is this: for every day that we delay implementing a ‘Casey Sensible Solution,’ we are in fact putting rural communities such as Lac Mégantic at risk from either rail disasters or spills from pipelines that have been around since the Eisenhower administration.”
Related posts:
The Complete Breakdown of How Charlie Shrem Did Nothing Wrong
Lawmakers Vote to Let Obama Take Your Passport Without Trial
Charlie Shrem, Bitcoin entrepreneur, interviewed by Jeffrey Tucker
FBI “Communities Against Terrorism” Suspicious Activity Reporting Flyers
The Forgotten Country Where Profits Beckon
Girl, But Not Boys Who Shared, Gets Kicked Out of School For Sexting
Nigel Farage: EU wants to steal money from Cypriots bank accounts
NSA ditching 90 percent of its system administrators to avoid leaks
Government Civil Liberties Panel Endorses NSA Surveillance
In Writing, the Justification Used by Obama to Kill Americans
Who Is Building the Private, Peer-to-Peer Marketplace?
Four Texas police officers charged with escorting loads of narcotics for pay
The Dark Side of the iPhone 5S Lines
India Wakes Up to Bitcoin
For Nearly Two Decades the U.S. Nuclear Launch Code Was 00000000