“An oil spill is 34 times more likely with a railway accident compared to just the aging pipeline infrastructure. So why then are we relying more and more on rail transports? The answer is simple: there is simply too much uninformed opposition to building new pipelines and replace the aging infrastructure criss-crossing North America. But the fact of the matter is this: for every day that we delay implementing a ‘Casey Sensible Solution,’ we are in fact putting rural communities such as Lac Mégantic at risk from either rail disasters or spills from pipelines that have been around since the Eisenhower administration.”
(Visited 43 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Iran is firing on all cylinders
Nomura "Sincerely Apologizes" For Blowing Up Investors
17 Dead, More than 200 Injured As Morsi Supporters Rally To Reject 'Coup'
Chris Odom on OpenTransactions
Senators want to ban Russian Banks from the United States over Syria
Campaign to Salvage Central Banking
Voters in Six States Approve Measures Nullifying Federal Acts
Bitcoin Icon Roger Ver Is Starting His Own Country With No Government
Neo & Bee CEO Danny Brewster Faces Fraud Allegations in Cyprus
Why the US debt crisis didn’t affect bitcoin
New law will ban protesters from riding mass transit in California
U.S. House kills ban on government backdoors in tech products
Gov. Christie Threatens NJ Residents With Post-Storm Tax Hikes
Welcome to the Welfare-Warfare State
Utah Gets Ready To Do Without the Feds