“An oil spill is 34 times more likely with a railway accident compared to just the aging pipeline infrastructure. So why then are we relying more and more on rail transports? The answer is simple: there is simply too much uninformed opposition to building new pipelines and replace the aging infrastructure criss-crossing North America. But the fact of the matter is this: for every day that we delay implementing a ‘Casey Sensible Solution,’ we are in fact putting rural communities such as Lac Mégantic at risk from either rail disasters or spills from pipelines that have been around since the Eisenhower administration.”
Related posts:
Josie Harris Reads Letter from Guantanamo Bay
Sure, You Can Steal Bitcoins. But Good Luck Laundering Them
Is It Time to Feel Sorry for the President and other Obamacare Supporters?
Reality Check: Can Ohio Voting Machines Be Hacked? The Facts Behind The Rumors
Corrupt Police Department in Florida
How nonprofits spend millions on elections and call it public welfare
Sen. Rand Paul Filibustering John Brennan CIA Nomination Over Domestic Drones
60 Lab Studies Now Confirm Cancer Link to a Vaccine You Probably Had as a Child
Gold Demand In One Chart: Physical vs ETF
Americans Forced to Close Their Intrade Accounts
Why Are European Governments So Terrified of 'Fake News'?
This Hated Stock Could Double From Here
Cop fakes body cam footage, prosecutors drop drug charges
$4.1m goes missing as Chinese bitcoin trading platform GBL vanishes
How Dozens of Companies Know You're Reading About Those NSA Leaks