“An oil spill is 34 times more likely with a railway accident compared to just the aging pipeline infrastructure. So why then are we relying more and more on rail transports? The answer is simple: there is simply too much uninformed opposition to building new pipelines and replace the aging infrastructure criss-crossing North America. But the fact of the matter is this: for every day that we delay implementing a ‘Casey Sensible Solution,’ we are in fact putting rural communities such as Lac Mégantic at risk from either rail disasters or spills from pipelines that have been around since the Eisenhower administration.”
Related posts:
This tiny corner of Rhode Island shows us the future of Social Security
First Online Eyewear Retailer to Accept Bitcoin for Products
‘Peace Through Strength’ Is a Racket
Sessions/Trump Pull Off an Amazing Feat -- Making the DEA Look Reasonable
7 Ways The Obama Administration Has Accelerated Police Militarization
The Private Security Industry In Brazil
MyRA: "A Start To A Secure Retirement", Promises Treasury Secretary
The War on the Gig Economy Has Begun: Homejoy Is the First Casualty
Top Constitutional Experts: Obama Is Worse than Nixon
Best U.S. Cities for Young Entrepreneurs
Who Owns the World’s Biggest Bitcoin Wallet? The FBI
Judge upholds Liberty Dollar founder's conviction, schedules sentencing
Nigel Farage: There is a Gathering Electoral Storm
Female Motorist Faces Down California Highway Patrol
"Due To Popular Demand" Goldman Starts Covering Bitcoin