“A divided federal appeals court ruled today that the government does not need a probable-cause warrant to access mobile-phone subscribers’ cell-site information, a decision reversing lower court decisions that said the location data was protected by the Fourth Amendment. The 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the third federal appeals court to decide the privacy issue. All the while, two federal appellate courts have now taken the government’s position that court warrants are not required for the location data. And a third federal appellate court said judges had the option to demand warrants.”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/warrantless-cell-tracking/
(Visited 33 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Kansas rejects marijuana advocacy group’s bid to adopt a highway
Inside Oklahoma’s Quest To Dominate The American Drone Industry
Nervous About Traffic Stops? I Am. You Should Be, Too
Kansas Prosecutor Defeated by Glaring Stupidity of Pot Laws
Where Li “Superman” Ka-Shing is Investing Right Now
Cruz' plan B for defunding Obamacare: ‘Shut down the military’
Missouri man facing charges for using fake penis to pass drug test
Imran Hussain on Frontier Investing and the UAE Tax-Free Zone
Malta: new residency scheme for foreign buyers & renters
Street Smarts with Jim Rogers
Human rights advocates raise concerns over increased police Taser use
Some Breathing Room for Iran
Another driver killed with stuck accelerator at 119mph
Bitcoin has arrived in Iran with a new website and a forum
Chilling Effect: Oracle Wins Appeal Against Google to Copyright Java APIs