
“A divided federal appeals court ruled today that the government does not need a probable-cause warrant to access mobile-phone subscribers’ cell-site information, a decision reversing lower court decisions that said the location data was protected by the Fourth Amendment. The 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is the third federal appeals court to decide the privacy issue. All the while, two federal appellate courts have now taken the government’s position that court warrants are not required for the location data. And a third federal appellate court said judges had the option to demand warrants.”
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/warrantless-cell-tracking/
Related posts:
Grading the Presidential Candidates on Marijuana Policy
On This Day in 1933
What Do You Call a Tool to Help Uber Avoid Gov't Stings? A Good Start.
Getting Arrested for Laughing Is No Joke
Man Has Home Ransacked by Police for Paying Cash
Zimbabwe Bitcoin Exchange Ban Lifted After Central Bank Fails To Appear
Is the “Ron Paul Revolution” Too Dangerous for Auburn?
Does Free Money Exist?
Bitcoin Gains Favor With Modern Day ‘Gold Bugs’ Seeking Financial Security
Bitcoin is NOT illegal in Thailand?
Alert: DHS Rounding up Veterans, Throwing them in Mental institutions
Dollar Bears Love Silver Coins
The Myth Of American Energy Independence: Is Nuclear the Ultimate Contrarian Investment?
The War On Cash Ratchets Up In Greece With “Soft” Cash Ban
SF Bay Area House Sales Plunge in June (Month-over-Month AND Year-over-Year)