“Describing these factors as a threat to ‘officer safety,’ the agents demanded access to the home to conduct a ‘protective sweep,’ during which ammunition and drugs were found. A district court denied Mongold’s motion to suppress the evidence. The US. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the district court and suppressed the evidence, noting that the ATF agents ‘could most easily have protected the officers’ safety by leaving [the] home, not by entering it.’ The Tenth Circuit quite sensibly slapped down this cynical argument for a warrantless search, but it was careful to specify that its sensible ruling is not to be used as a precedent.”
http://prolibertate.us/index.php/inventing-pretexts-to-ignore-the?blog=7
Related posts:
French court rules e-cigs are tobacco products
How a 30-year-old lawyer exposed NSA mass surveillance of Americans—in 1975
Bitcoins Fail Currency Test in Scandinavia’s Richest Nation
Gold, the Titanic & Lifeboats - Why it's Important to Own Physical Gold
Obama: "If You Can't Trust Us, We Are Going To Have A Problem"
Jim Rogers: How High (or Low) Will Gold Go?
Is the Constitution Bailing Out the Banks?
California Dreamin’
Pot Legalization Draws Majority Support Nationwide
US Immigration Outlook: From Uncertainty To Panic
Colorado Governor Signs Marijuana Legalization Bills
Reality Check: Senate Moving Forward On Internet Tax Mandate
Students Banned from Passing Out Constitutions on Constitution Day
American threats against innocent expats are increasing
New Jersey Suddenly Begins Enforcing Air Rifle Ban