“The Constitution’s failure to protect free speech at a seemingly basic level points to a major defect in its design. While it may be praiseworthy in forcefully demanding that the government it authorizes respect the rights of its citizens, it has not provided the real structural support to ensure that those demands are met. Anyone seriously interested in protecting free speech must push for a very radical ‘constitutional amendment.’ We should work not just to change the words of the document we call ‘the Constitution,’ but instead amend our legal system by completely changing the way it’s constituted.”
Related posts:
Bitcoin and the Future of Currency
Four Obamacare Taxes That Hurt Mothers Most
Innovation in legal highs leaves governments in the dust
Apparently, Perjury Isn't a Crime When Police Commit It
Australia liberated from their long national green nightmare
Did RNC "Scripted" Rules Change Start A Civil War In The Republican Party?
DOJ Creates New Position To Target “Anti-Government Views”
Spontaneous Speed Camera Destruction
U.S. African Military Activity Is a “Recruiting Tool” for Terror Groups
Man persecuted over raw milk resurrects olive oil from thousand-year-old olive trees
Millions of Chinese Smartphone Users Can’t Be Wrong
CNN’s Sanjay Gupta apologizes for misleading Americans about marijuana
The War on Privacy is coming to a license plate near you…
New England Marijuana Legalization Bills Coming
EU inquiry draft finds NSA, GCHQ activities ‘illegal’ – report
