“The Constitution’s failure to protect free speech at a seemingly basic level points to a major defect in its design. While it may be praiseworthy in forcefully demanding that the government it authorizes respect the rights of its citizens, it has not provided the real structural support to ensure that those demands are met. Anyone seriously interested in protecting free speech must push for a very radical ‘constitutional amendment.’ We should work not just to change the words of the document we call ‘the Constitution,’ but instead amend our legal system by completely changing the way it’s constituted.”
Related posts:
The Feds Step Up Utility Growth
Who Is Building the Private, Peer-to-Peer Marketplace?
Justice Scalia Thinks US Concentration Camps 'Will Happen Again'
Obama Voluntarily Resigned as a Lawyer
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Sends SWAT Team To Gun Down a Fawn
Fincen's New Regulations Are Choking Bitcoin Entrepreneurs
Clapper: Election Meddling And Regime Change In The "Best Interests Of The People"
Why the IRS Can Now “Ground” You
Overstock.com to Open Exchange for Legal Crypto-Asset Trading
Glenn Greenwald: New York's top court highlights the meaninglessness and menace of the term 'terrori...
Congress Can Use “Speech or Debate” to Expose Administration’s Syria Lies
Jeffrey Tucker: Who Will Lose in the War on Contractors?
Caterpillar Punked By Chinese Fraud, To Write Off Half Of Q4 Earnings
Man gets ticket for running stop sign, dashcam video shows he didn't
Ron Paul: Military "Cuts" - Don't Believe the Hype
