“The Constitution’s failure to protect free speech at a seemingly basic level points to a major defect in its design. While it may be praiseworthy in forcefully demanding that the government it authorizes respect the rights of its citizens, it has not provided the real structural support to ensure that those demands are met. Anyone seriously interested in protecting free speech must push for a very radical ‘constitutional amendment.’ We should work not just to change the words of the document we call ‘the Constitution,’ but instead amend our legal system by completely changing the way it’s constituted.”
Related posts:
Chickenpox (Varicella) Vaccine: This Is Why a Shingles Epidemic is Bolting Straight at the U.S.
House unexpectedly votes to stop warrantless NSA searches
Ron Paul / Glenn Greenwald Interview
Florida Woman Furious After SWAT Team Orders Her Out of Her Home
Lieberman, Rove, Kristol Urge Obama to Attack Syria
Facebook Approves Dogecoin Tipping App
A Purse Snatching Led to the Legal Justification for NSA Domestic Spying
It’s time to talk about the role of police in our public schools
How New Zealand banned software patents without violating international law
The Horror Every Day: Police Brutality In Houston Goes Unpunished
The Sad Unemployment Picture Now Compared to the 1982 Recession Recovery
The Obamacare Nightmare Will Officially Start October 1
Australian Gov Now to Seize People's Live Bank Accts – If 'Inactive'
Android Security Vulnerability Threatens Existing Bitcoin Wallets
One Man’s Quest to Prove Saudi Arabia Bankrolled 9/11
