“Networks, when attacked, become even more decentralized and resilient. A good example is Napster and its successors, each of which has more closely approached an ideal peer-to-peer model, and further freed itself from reliance on infrastructure that can be shut down by central authority, than its predecessors. Hierarchies, on the other hand, respond to attack by becoming even more ossified, brittle and closed. Hierarchies respond to leaks by becoming internally opaque and closed even to themselves, so that their information is compartmentalized and they are less able to make effective use of the knowledge dispersed among their members.”
Related posts:
Iran and Iraq, BFF (Best Friends Forever)?
The “Chechen Connection”, Al Qaeda and the Boston Marathon Bombings
Four Charts Showing How Obama’s Statist Agenda Is Hurting Jobs and Growth
Thaddeus Russell: 'A Renegade History of the United States'
Obama Amends the Constitution By Statute
The State, Not Manning, is the Criminal
The Blow That Killed America 100 Years Ago
Get Ahead of the Pack and Unload Bonds Now
Taxation of Americans Abroad versus the 14th Amendment
Revolutionary France’s Road to Hyperinflation
David Graeber, DEBT: The First 5,000 Years [2012]
Could You Be Arrested For Offering A Lyft?
Murray Rothbard: Fighting for Oil? [1990]
The Man Who Almost Stopped Julius Caesar
Drones, Tanks, and Grenade Launchers: Coming to Your Police Department
