“The shutdown of two small e-mail providers on Thursday illustrates why it is so hard for Internet companies to challenge secret government surveillance: to protect their customers’ data from federal authorities, the two companies essentially committed suicide. In effect, both businesses destroyed their assets — in part or in full — to avoid turning over their customers’ data. Such public displays are far more difficult for large companies to make, and help explain why the most public efforts to challenge secret government orders have come from small companies and nonprofits.”
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/two-providers-of-encrypted-e-mail-shut-down/
(Visited 41 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Uruguay to sell legal marijuana for $1 a gram
Bitcoin Triggers Buzz, Controversy … and Now, Startups
Aetna to Obamacare: We're outta here
Uruguay takes 'war on drugs' in new direction: The state as dealer
Top Treasury Official Sees No Widespread Criminal Bitcoin Use
Sterling crisis looms as UK current account deficit balloons
India arrests man caught smuggling gold bars in cellphone
Mammogram radiation may put young women at higher risk of breast cancer
U.S. Navy: Cost of strikes against Syria ‘nagging’ but not ‘extraordinary’
Power Metals CD launched with exposure to gold, silver, copper
EU army plans kept secret from voters
Dutch court finds six coffee shop owners guilty of selling cannabis to non-residents
How A Teacher Made $1 Million Selling Lesson Plans
Macedonia Plans to Set up Tax Haven
Obama quietly extends post-9/11 state of national emergency