
“The shutdown of two small e-mail providers on Thursday illustrates why it is so hard for Internet companies to challenge secret government surveillance: to protect their customers’ data from federal authorities, the two companies essentially committed suicide. In effect, both businesses destroyed their assets — in part or in full — to avoid turning over their customers’ data. Such public displays are far more difficult for large companies to make, and help explain why the most public efforts to challenge secret government orders have come from small companies and nonprofits.”
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/08/two-providers-of-encrypted-e-mail-shut-down/
Related posts:
Bitcoin surges 40% after US Senate hearing
Trump Vows to Unveil ‘Additional Security’ After 'Disgraceful' Court Blocks Travel Ban
D.C. Speed cameras: Traffic enforcement or highway robbery?
Bank of Japan "Very Interested" in Bitcoin: Kuroda
Sen. Jay Rockefeller pitches cybersecurity bill to top CEOs
U.S. to leave 'training' military forces in Jordan
Selfie sticks banned at US attractions
Oklahoma tornado victims denied permits to rebuild their homes
Australia scraps plan to filter Internet
Turkey Arrests More Than A Dozen In Connection With Mine Disaster
Chinese buyers lead foreign investment in US housing market
911 Dispatcher Tells Sexual Assault Victim No Cops Will Help Her Due To Budget Cuts
UN-backed Somalia government reintroduces taxes after 23 years
U. of California extends smoking ban to e-cigarettes, chewing tobacco
China’s shadow banking reform faces its first test