“Secretary Janet Napolitano’s resignation is the perfect time get rid of the Department. Its alleged purpose is to prevent terrorism. But it’s trying to solve a problem that doesn’t really exist. You’re far more likely to die from bathtub drowning, home appliances, or deer accidents than from terrorism. This tells me the DHS is a waste of time. Spending shot up from $20 billion in 2002 to $60 billion this year. Also, the DHS isn’t really about security or terrorism prevention at all: The primary counter-terrorism agencies – FBI, CIA, and NSA – aren’t even part of the DHS. Less than 25% of DHS grants actually go to terrorism prevention.”
http://www.downsizedc.org/blog/does-homeland-security-really-protect-you
Related posts:
Paul Rosenberg: 'Production Versus Plunder', Part 2
Carlo Ponzi, Alias Uncle Sam
Neocon think tank next to call out racist, pro-war roots of War on Drugs
Reevaluating Drug Courts: No Mother Should Have to Go Through What I Did
The Trick to Suppressing Revolution: Keeping Debt/Tax Serfdom Bearable
James Bovard: Bitter lessons 25 years after Waco, Texas, siege
Vitalik Buterin on Cryptoeconomics and Markets in Everything
Gary North: How Come We're So Rich?
Why Oil Could Move Higher--Much Higher
Uncovering License Plate Scanners: The Next Big Thing in Government Tracking
India: Emerging from Poverty or Stuck in the Past?
Bitcoin and China: More than Meets the Eye?
The NSA and Its “Compliance Problems”
Cheating to Learn: How a UCLA professor gamed a game theory midterm
John Kerry, Organization Man
