“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
Related posts:
Norway's Biggest Bank Demands Cash Ban
Why it’s time to double down on Greek stocks
Congress to cut benefits for Veterans?
Amazon unveils “Prime Air,” a plan to deliver by drone in just 30 minutes
New Jersey woman busted for showing breasts, middle fingers to surveillance camera
We Finally Won One Against the Police State!
Slave Dollars: State Guarantee Private Prisons 96% Occupancy
Raspberry Pi used in new Bitcoin-operated pool table
Here's Why You Think Inflation Is Much Higher Than the Government Says
Brzezinski: ‘Global Political Awakening’ Making Syrian War Difficult
Get Your Money Out: “All Legal Bank Deposit Protections Are Now Officially Gone”
Chinese Investors Pile Into Bitcoin; BTC China Raises $5 Million
Navy Uses US Citizens as Pawns in Domestic War Games
Would you like being paid in gold? It’s possible… in Singapore
David Lewis attorney says gun confiscation no “error”
