“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
Related posts:
Democrat Kathy Hochul Plumps for Drones at Niagara Falls Air Base
Vigilante Detroit residents attack suspected rapist after police fail to act
Ohio University Considers Mandatory Re-Education Classes For Smokers
HBO executive: Rampant piracy of ‘Game of Thrones’ is a ‘compliment’
Cops with Drones: Alameda Co., CA Weighs Technology vs. Privacy
Public school is now officially a prison; Parents not allowed to walk kids to class
IRS Targeted Organizations Named With the Words "Tea Party" Or "Patriot"
BitPay Banks $510K In Investment To Become PayPal for Bitcoin, Already Has 2,100 Businesses On Board
Blowback: How U.S. Drones, Coups, and Invasions Create More Violence
Should We Really Put Gold in an IRA?
No One Saw This Coming…
Sauerkraut Freedom
FBI warns retailers: more breaches are coming
How Newegg crushed the “shopping cart” patent and saved online retail
Inflation at the Currency Level