“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
Related posts:
The Aden Sisters on Gold, Commodities and Near-Term Market Prospects
Evolution of the IMF Is Directed History
Free State Project Demands Apology For “Domestic Terrorism” Claims In Tank Grant Application
‘Campaign to Stop Killer Robots’ calling for ban on ‘fully autonomous weapons’
Brazilian Central Bank Launches Intervention Program To Stop The Bleeding
Bloomberg loves security cameras –until NYPD officers are ordered to wear them
Very Bad News for Europe’s Young People
Evidence That Consolidated Global Power Is Wielded by a Tiny Elite
The New Normal: Boston Bombing Suspect Interrogated Without Counsel
IRS Needs AR-15's For "Standoff Capabilities"?
WikiLeaks: Snowden Risks Being Stuck in Russia 'Permanently'
Oklahoma man faces life in prison for selling legal Colorado marijuana
Unitarian Church, Gun Groups Join EFF to Sue NSA Over Illegal Surveillance
Dark Wallet Meeting - interview with Wendell Davis
David Lewis attorney says gun confiscation no “error”