“Words like ‘interference’ or ‘obstruction’ seem to be thrown around quite frequently when law enforcement officers decide they’d rather not be filmed while on duty. How the passive act of filming can interfere with investigations or obstruct officials is left to the imagination. Fortunately (I guess…), law enforcement officials have very vivid imaginations. This allows them to arrest, detain, hassle or confiscate devices as needed, in order preserve the peace by chilling speech. The latest definition of ‘interference’ stretches the limits of credulity — to nearly 100 feet.”
Related posts:
I Bought Subway With Bitcoin and It Was Awesome
Federal court: TSA agents can’t be sued for false arrests, abuse, or assault
Ferguson Protests Spotlight a Much Bigger Problem
Albany police: SWAT used poor black neighborhood for training because it’s ‘realistic’
Yellen Says Prices `High' for Stocks, Commercial Real Estate
Can Germany Really Tax Bitcoin?
Why Are so Many Refugees Drowning? And Why Don't They Fly?
Border guards force US citizen to unlock his work phone
Meanwhile, This Is What Putin Is Doing...
This Hated Stock Could Double From Here
19 year Old Boy Suspect: Why does Boston Celebrate Martial Law with Chants of ‘USA, USA’?
John Kerry: Then And Now
Lawmakers Who Upheld NSA Phone Spying Received Double the Defense Industry Cash
Lightning-Like Transformation
The Great Beer Conspiracy to Overthrow the U.S.
