“In short, the Holder Memorandum directs prosecutors to prevent application of mandatory minimum sentences for a select group of less-culpable defendants. Isn’t this A good thing? Yes, with a but. It’s a good thing that the Jane Does of the world can be sentenced according to the judge’s discretion and not according to mandatory minimum sentences. A lot of low-level, unsophisticated, and hapless mules and mopes and dupes will get far lower sentences, which is both just and less expensive for you, the taxpayer.
But I’m not happy that the methodology for the change is a fairly dramatic expansion of prosecutorial discretion.”
Related posts:
Former Citi Exec Goes On TV, Pleads That Big Banks Need More of Your Money
A Note on the Goofy U.S. Government
Should You Trust Your Instincts on Gold?
Cyprus and the reality of banking: Deposit haircuts are both inevitable and the right thing to do
Politics of Bombing Syria Is Secondary to the President’s Power
Herding the Sheeple into Government-Controlled Health Care
War in Syria: Madness on the Potomac
What happened in West, Texas?
Bovard: Yes, the FBI is America's secret police
A few questions about Syria
Why Bitcoin is poised to break out to all-time highs
Lew Rockwell: The Only Choice on November 6th
QE3: A Risky Ploy to Solve the Problems of Bad Fiscal Policy with Bad Monetary Policy
Pepe Escobar: Manning guilty; war criminals on the loose
James Bovard: Comey firing justly knocks FBI off its pedestal