“SB 648 would place vaporizers under the same stringent restrictions as tobacco cigarettes, banning their use in public buildings, restaurants, workplaces, hotel lobbies, playgrounds, within 20 feet of exit doors, etc. There is no evidence that vaporizers pose an appreciable second-hand smoking risk to the public. Users are known to vaporize in elevators and crowded rooms without any detectable odor or adverse notice. Bystanders are routinely exposed to worse emissions from kitchens, grills, garden plants, buses, chimneys, detergents, room deodorizers, gas stations, etc.”
http://www.canorml.org/news/CA_Bill_Against_E_Cigarettes_Harmful_to_Consumer_Health
Related posts:
Israel Names Chairman of JPMorgan Chase International the New Central Bank Chief
Warriors news: Will Golden State accept Bitcoin next?
Ron Paul 'Worried' U.S. Might Kill Snowden With Drone
Adam Kokesh & Ron Paul vs Peter Schiff on Statism vs Voluntaryism
Marc Andreessen: “The world is going to see an explosion of countries”
The Real Reason for the Iraq War
Burning Up the West: Feds, Greens Cause Catastrophic Fires
Subprime lending execs back in business five years after crash
Greece demands €278bn WWII reparations from Germany
A Ceasefire in the IRS’ War on US Citizens?
Physicist concocts ice cream that changes color when you lick it
Radley Balko: “Once a town gets a SWAT team you want to use it”
State Regulators Force Vermont's Only Bitcoin ATM Offline
Bill Bonner: Avoid This Popular Stock in 2014…
Kaspersky Software Vilified For Catching Classified NSA Malware