“The orders are meant to help prosecutors compel testimony from problematic witnesses in criminal cases. But the orders are supposed to be used only in extraordinary circumstances, often when prosecutors fear a potential witness might flee instead of testifying. Controversy arose around federal prosecutors’ deployment of material witness orders after 9/11, when it came to light that they had used the warrants to detain large numbers of people to provide information about terror cases. But the use of these orders at the state-level remains largely unexamined.”
http://www.propublica.org/article/a-powerful-legal-tool-and-its-potential-for-abuse
Related posts:
US and Germany to enter no-spying agreement, German government says
US government: We can jail you indefinitely for not decrypting your data
The Minimum Wage Law’s Effect: No Jobs for Teenagers
Six States That Could Pass Marijuana Initiatives This Year
The Hidden Edge of Junior Mining Companies
The Blank Slate State
The Lifespan of Storage Media
Bank of Japan Panics At Surging Rates, Offers To Buy Unlimited Debt
Want to Defend Your Privacy?
UN official tells US to stop drone strikes
Jim Rogers shares insights on his book Street Smarts
DEA ‘Cold Consent’ Encounters Constitute Federal Stop-and-Frisk
Ford Exec: 'We Know Everyone Who Breaks The Law' Thanks To GPS
The Internet Archive Rescues Bitcoiners From Banking Oblivion
ANZ opens Gold vault in Singapore