
“To his credit, Concord police chief John Duval apologized for calling these groups domestic terrorists, but the point was and is clear. The biggest concern and fear of any political system are those that seek to undermine state authority and its institutionalized plunder masked in law, badges, and costumes. If terrorism is defined as the threat or use of violence against the innocent to achieve political ends, then who really are the domestic terrorists? The groups of people with the radical notion that other people are not their property, or the institution that claims the right, duty and moral imperative to initiate aggressive violence?”
http://libertycrier.com/free-staters-tell-concord-police-tanks-but-no-tanks/
Related posts:
The Big-Picture Economy, Part 3: Scarcity, Risk and Debt
Bitcoin, the Darknet Economy, and the Low Over-Head Revolution
Bill Bonner: A Crash Course in Money (Part III)
How Did Americans Survive Until 1892 Without the Pledge of Allegiance?
A Glimpse into the Coming Collapse
Ask James, Part II: How to Be a Millionaire, How To Be Ugly, How to Network, Back To School Reading ...
The Liefare-Warfare State: A History Of U.S. False Flag Events
The Great Deception, Part II
Born Libertarian: Doug Casey on Ron Paul and the Price of Freedom
If You Have Nothing to Hide, Be Very Worried
Can the Police Go to the Front Door of a Home With “No Trespassing” Signs?
Sibel Edmonds Explains Who's At The Top Of The Pyramid
The Real Founders of Democracy Would Be Pissed
Bob Higgs: The Relentless March of the U.S. Police State
Two Chess Moves Away from Capital Controls