“Quantitative easing has amounted to an audacious experiment in trickle-down economics. Among other things, it has artificially boosted the stock market in the hope that enriching a few — the top 1 percent of American households owned 42 percent of the nation’s financial assets in 2010 — will help the many. Meanwhile, retirees who don’t dare buy stocks have seen their modest bank deposits stagnate with interest rates near zero. Economists hate to admit it, but the profession is as much faith as science. Counting on monetary policy to secure full employment is like attempting vascular surgery with a dull ax.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/21/opinion/wanted-a-boring-leader-for-the-fed.html?_r=1&
Related posts:
Big Brother Spying Didn’t Stop Connecticut School Shooter … Or 9/11
Fed to America: ‘QE Scam Will Continue’
Bill Bonner: Papal Fallibility
The British Empire in Yemen
Why the White House Is Panicking About Obamacare
Bill de Blasio’s housing pipe dreams
Debate Highlight: Showdown Over Benghazi
Leaping to Conclusions
John Hussman: Air-Pockets, Free-Falls, and Crashes
The Government Is Lying to Us About Cybersecurity
Something’s not all right with Medicare
Justin Raimondo: Police-State ‘Progressivism’
Why Bitcoin is poised to break out to all-time highs
Doug Casey: The Gold Crash Is Not What Either Bulls or Bears Are Telling You
Will Grigg: "This Isn't America" -- You Can't Say That Here