“Quantitative easing has amounted to an audacious experiment in trickle-down economics. Among other things, it has artificially boosted the stock market in the hope that enriching a few — the top 1 percent of American households owned 42 percent of the nation’s financial assets in 2010 — will help the many. Meanwhile, retirees who don’t dare buy stocks have seen their modest bank deposits stagnate with interest rates near zero. Economists hate to admit it, but the profession is as much faith as science. Counting on monetary policy to secure full employment is like attempting vascular surgery with a dull ax.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/21/opinion/wanted-a-boring-leader-for-the-fed.html?_r=1&
Related posts:
Watching the Anti-Freedom Actions of Francois Hollande
Jim Rogers ET NOW Interview - 29 May 2013
Confiscation by the Installment Plan
Glenn Greenwald: Obama campaign brags about its whistleblower persecutions
Lightning Fast, Dirt Cheap: Bitcoin Shows What Banking Could Be
“It Could Never Happen Here”
Ron Paul: Pompeo and Haspel are Symptoms of a Deeper Problem
The Will Of The People Doesn’t Mean Jack To Drug Warriors
So, Sir Patrick Stewart Wants to Become a US Citizen?
Crony Capitalists: The Biggest Winners From President Obama's Re-Election
Government Tattoo Statists of America
Drones Are Like Structured Finance
Is it Time to Give Up on Gold?
The Brutality of “Border Security”
Jim Rogers: 'Run for the Hills' Now, I'm Doing It