“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
Michael Scheuer: Obama, Rice, Kerry, McCain, and Graham intervening for more war
Bitcoin developer: Are bitcoin thieves revealing NSA back doors?
If Edward Snowden Had Read This Book …
Debt: Destroyer of Lives, Businesses, and Countries
Investors, Run for Cover From the Incoming ‘Taper Bomb’
Why Is the U.S. Destabilizing One Country After Another?
Neocon think tank next to call out racist, pro-war roots of War on Drugs
Who Really Started the Korean War?
Driver’s Taxes and Other Money-Grabbing Schemes Throughout History
The $4 Trillion Money Printing Press
The Best Quality Of Life In The World: Residency & Citizenship In Austria
Wendy McElroy: Only Places Have Rights?
Could a Government Cash Grab Happen Here?
Why Foreign Real Estate is an Internationalization Grand Slam
Jacob Hornberger: Dismantle the International Checkpoints