“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
(Visited 30 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
Detlev Schlichter: Some personal thoughts on surviving the monetary meltdown
The Case of the Missing $700 Billion
Support the Egyptian Uprising and Go to Jail
The Government’s Us? Not Last Time I Checked
Philip Giraldi: Where Are They Now?
Fifteen Benefits of the War on Drugs
Teenage Dystopia: The Cycle of Oppression and Resistance
4 Ways Living Abroad Can Give You More Freedom
Your Personal Gold Standard
Attempts To Eliminate Cash Are More Than A Privacy Disaster
Southern Slavery: Two Systems of Management
Is the U.S. at War with Al-Qaeda?
20 Things 20-Year-Olds Don't Get
Dimes on Black and Dynamite on Red
The Whistleblower’s Guide to the Orwellian Galaxy: How to Leak to the Press