“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
The Best Quality Of Life In The World: Residency & Citizenship In Austria
The States Could Reform Obamacare If Only We Would Let Them
The morning after: When a government destroys its currency
Eric Margolis: Syria's WMD?
America, Flirting with the Dark Side of History
Could Bitcoin (or equivalent) Become a Global Reserve Currency?
Will Grigg: The Protected Predator Class
John Whitehead: ‘I am not a number. I am a free man!’
Fifty Ways to Leave Leviathan
Blowback: How Torture Fuels Terrorism Rather Than Reduces It
"I'm Going to Take Him Out"
Hold US Policymakers to Their Abysmal Record on Foreign Meddling
Got Dough? How Billionaires Rule Our Schools [2011]
Kill Lists Will Continue
John Hussman: Yes, This Is An Equity Bubble