“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
The risk of taking on Syria
Nasser Al-Awlaki: The Drone That Killed My Grandson
Too Big To Fail Is Now Bigger Than Ever Before
The Obama Quagmire
How to Be a YouTube Star and Beat Justin Timberlake in the Charts
"I'm Going to Take Him Out"
A Cypherpunk's Manifesto (March 9th, 1993)
David Galland: Lessons from the Argentine
Climate Change and Captain Kirk
America – Land of the Free?
How to Be a Rogue Superpower: A Manual for the Twenty-First Century
How Police Became a Standing Army
A Congregation of Liars: The U.S. Government
The Neoliberal Financial Skim
The Idiot’s Guide to Becoming a Bitcoin Billionaire