“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
American Pravda: Our Great Purge of the 1940s
A Cypherpunk's Manifesto (March 9th, 1993)
Did the Government Drive Aaron Swartz to Suicide?
Casey's Louis James Warns: 'Don't Try to Time the Market'
Are Police in America Now a Military, Occupying Force?
Paul Craig Roberts: 2014 Will Bring More Social Collapse
A New "Global Standard" Takes Shape
How to Lose a Constitution—Lessons from Roman History
Jeffrey Tucker: Is There A Viable Alternative To College?
The Evolution of Government
Sheila Bair’s Bailout Blame Game
Bill Bonner: What I'm Doing With My Money Now
Decentralize to Neutralize Turmoil in Middle East
Bill Bonner: To the Class of 2015, Part 2
Jeffrey Tucker: How Medical Innovation Redefines Our World