“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
Stefan Molyneux: The Truth About Obamacare
Martin Luther King, the White Rose, and the NSA
What Happens When the Surf Is Down: Contemplating Stocks without QE
Canola Oil: Good or Bad?
The Evolution of Government
Bitcoin Takes on Gold
Bill Bonner: The Best Wealth Building Advice You’ll Never Take
The Disturbing Truth Behind Your Next Income Tax Return
Should States Be Held Liable for Executing an Innocent Individual?
Name That Black Swan
The Real State Secret: Spies Aren't Very Good At Their Jobs
Anarchy: The Basis for a Civilized Society
Fifteen Benefits of the War on Drugs
What If Stocks, Bonds and Housing All Go Down Together?
Why You Should Take Your “Health” Into Your Own Hands