“All of this provides a real-world example of the possibility of adjudicating disputes in a private and contractual manner. It does not take a huge leap of faith to conclude that a decentralized arbitration system could be extended to smaller and smaller segments of the population, ultimately leading to a private security environment. If it can be done between states, why not between individuals (or private insurance / security companies) in a world without states as we currently use the term? Why limit the possibilities by geographical boundaries – some form of panarchy, if you will?”
http://bionicmosquito.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-century-of-arbitration-and-peace.html
Related posts:
Eleven Years after 9/11, Guantánamo Is a Political Prison
Central banks that trade on the stock market [2013]
Public school students being tracked continually
Interview with Peter Thiel, the Popular Contrarian
How the Nazis Used Gun Control
‘We the People’: The New Permanent Underclass in America
Singapore: A Case of Libertarian Orientalism?
What the NSA Revelations Tell Us about America's Police State
Capitalism: A Hate Story
Koch Has No Power to Coerce Anybody; That's Why He Needs Government
David Graeber, DEBT: The First 5,000 Years [2012]
Central Bankers' Nightmare: Goldman Sachs Might Go Bust
US Markets Are Running On Borrowed Money, Borrowed Time
Smartphone & Laptop Searches: Know Your Rights
Obama Has Decided That It Is Safer To Buy Congress Than To Go It Alone