“Monsanto’s entire case against Vernon Bowman — as with Percy Schmeiser — is that their profits will be negatively affected if they’e not empowered to dictate what Vernon Bowman does on his own land and with his own stuff. The relief they’re requesting is that the state should therefore so empower them. This is not a case of a ‘bad’ or ‘over-broad’ or ‘improperly applied’ patent. By its very nature, ‘intellectual property’ always represents an assertion on the part of one person of ownership title to the minds, bodies and property of others.”
Related posts:
David Galland: Three Levels of Survival Skills
Anthony Gregory: Obama’s Persecution of Bradley Manning
Jacob Hornberger: Why Kennedy Had to Be Removed
Who Are the Power Elite?
“Cruel and Unusual” Is the Only Way to Describe It
The Power Elite-Obama Connection
An Idiot’s Guide to Bitcoin: the man behind the book
David Stockman: The End of U.S. Imperium—Finally!
Declare Your Independence
Gun Ownership: American Exceptionalism
How Snowden's Revelations Have Strengthened the NSA
Americans – Like Nazi Germans – Don’t Notice that All of Our Rights Are Slipping Away
Government Spying Has Always Focused On Crushing Dissent … Not On Keeping Us Safe
Hong Kong Wrong [2006]
Judge Napolitano: Is the FISA Court constitutional?
