“Monsanto’s entire case against Vernon Bowman — as with Percy Schmeiser — is that their profits will be negatively affected if they’e not empowered to dictate what Vernon Bowman does on his own land and with his own stuff. The relief they’re requesting is that the state should therefore so empower them. This is not a case of a ‘bad’ or ‘over-broad’ or ‘improperly applied’ patent. By its very nature, ‘intellectual property’ always represents an assertion on the part of one person of ownership title to the minds, bodies and property of others.”
Related posts:
Will Grigg: Living in Amerika
Why Bond Market Bulls Are About to Get Crushed
It Won't Stay in Vegas: The Metro PD's Homeland Security Theater
Jeffrey Tucker: Canada: Land of the Freer?
Jeffrey Tucker, Captured, Cuffed, and Jailed: A Personal Story
Why The U.S. Job Market Remains Terribly Bleak
Eric Margolis: Obama, Don't Play Chess With KGB
Doug French: The Market Is Rigged
The State: Judge in its Own Cause
David Stockman on his Book and the Bailouts
The IMF, the SDR, and the Dollar: One Big Happy
A Letter to America from the Son of an American
Jacob Hornberger: Dealing with the Cops
CEO: Tech companies should not permit governments to use face recognition
A Nation Unhinged: The Grim Realities of “The Real American War”
