“When Diane Sawyer asked Bush why he had claimed with such certainty that there were so many weapons in Iraq, he replied: ‘What’s the difference? The possibility that [Saddam] could acquire weapons, If he were to acquire weapons, he would be the danger.’ What’s the difference? In a society based on the rule of law, the difference would be a criminal prosecution. MSNBC and Hubris steer us away from any ideas of accountability. And no connection is drawn to current war lies about Iran or other nations. But the production of programs like this one that prolong Americans’ awareness of the lies that destroyed Iraq are the best hope Iran has right now.”
http://warisacrime.org/content/hubris-isnt-half-it
Related posts:
Google's Trillion-Dollar Driverless Car -- Part 2: The Ripple Effects
Detroit, Demographics and Detonation
New York’s Crony Motivated Swipe Against the Sharing Economy
Police Militarization: The New Search and Seizure
John Hussman: The Bubble Right In Front Of Our Faces
David Galland: Welcome to the Company Store
The Financial System Doesn't Just Enable Theft, It Is Theft
Gupta Mea Culpa
A Letter to America from the Son of an American
Bye-Bye, Bernanke… Hello Timmy?
US Markets Are Running On Borrowed Money, Borrowed Time
Barack Obama’s Nixonian Fed Pick
10 investing insights from Street Smarts by Jim Rogers
Criminalizing Americans for Government Profit
A Brief History of False Flag Attacks: Or Why Government Loves State Sponsored Terror