“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
Surveying the wreckage of torpedoed Swiss-US tax deal
Syrian opposition leader resigns, castigating global ‘inaction’
10 things baby boomers won’t tell you: The aging Me generation is still putting itself first
North Korea joins new era as property bubble grows
Jamie Dimon says he regrets calling bitcoin a fraud
Disruptions: A Digital Underworld Cloaked in Anonymity
Auditor Urges Safeguards as USDA Pays 6,336 Dead People
UK to double number of drones in Afghanistan
As haze clears, are American opinions on marijuana reaching tipping point?
Chinese loan to Argentina was expected in November
How Laura Poitras Helped Snowden Spill His Secrets
Billionaire Saudi prince fires celebrity TV preacher for Muslim Brotherhood links
D.C. Mayor Proposes More Speed Cameras to Balance Budget
German court rules that ECB's 2012 bond-buying plan is legal
Anti-NSA group adopts highway to get close to Utah Data Center