
“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
With its leaders facing trial, Kenya quits International Criminal Court
Turkish court throws out Taksim redevelopment project that sparked mass protests
Gitmo inmate who was deemed no threat on hunger strikes and force feedings
Bond mutual funds post $34 billion outflow in December
Obamacare, Simplified
China slaps cap on overseas UnionPay cash withdrawals
Abenomics Spurs Gold Sales in Japan as Inflation Hedge
Video of Syrian rebel fighter cutting out heart of soldier and eating it condemned
Post Office to release fashion line
California Sheriff Strips Forest Service Of State-Law Enforcement Power
Bailout Banks Made Riskier Loans: Study [2011]
Zimbabwe to Seize Mines While Compensating Banks
CIA rendition flights from rustic North Carolina called to account by citizens
The DEA Wants to Use a $37 Pot Sale to Seize a $1.5 Million Anaheim Building
Mozilla plans '$25 smartphone' for emerging markets