
“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
Disgraced French budget minister lied to Swiss bank over taxes
Holder promises not to pursue death penalty against Snowden
What Government Schools Can Teach Us About Government Health Care
Financial services in developing countries
Al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri says U.S. behind coup against Mohamed Morsi
Al-Qaida turns tide for rebels in battle for eastern Syria
Google Approves Cyanogen’s Oppo N1 Phone
Newly Hired Detroit Emergency Manager Has Some Financial Issues Of His Own
China's state newspaper praises Edward Snowden for 'tearing off Washington's sanctimonious mask'
Japan nuclear agency says Fukushima water leak risk exaggerated
North Korean spy’s memoir details ‘enemization’ training by abducted South Koreans
Okla. prison head gets new bullet-resistant SUV after botched execution
New Security Device Put To Use In Edmond Schools
China: We would fight a trade war 'to the end'
Thousands of protesters call for Yemen to be broken up