
“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
China downgrades U.S. credit rating, accuses of 'holding world hostage'
RomneyCare 2.0
Bitcoin-based credit card reportedly due in two months
New $100 bill costs 60% more to produce
Erie County Sheriff Howard on SAFE Act: ‘I won’t enforce it’
Idaho Court of Appeals overturns marijuana DUI conviction
Swiss banks face massive fines over Americans’ untaxed bank accounts
Close monitoring of prostate tumors may make radiation, surgery unnecessary
EU backs Madrid in row over move to take back Catalonia
Homeland Security mass US citizen face-scanning program rolled out in Orlando
Bitcoin entrepreneurs want to put virtual coins in your wallet
Senate committee strikes deal on resolution authorizing force against Syria
Italian showdown with Germany as Enrico Letta rejects 'death by austerity'
China’s Spending on Renewable Energy May Total 1.8 Trillion Yuan
U.S. tax law has some expatriates waiving the American flag