
“Scientists who study human behaviour are more likely than average to report exaggerated or eye-catching results if they are based in the United States, according to an analysis of more than 1,000 research papers in psychiatry and genetics. This bias could be due to the research culture in the US, authors of the analysis said, which tends to preferentially reward scientists for the novelty and immediate impact of a piece of work over the quality or its long-term contribution to the field. One of the authors said that there was intense competition in the US for research funds and, subsequently, pressure to report novel findings in prestigious, high-impact scientific journals.”
Related posts:
How Mapping Student Debt Changes the Debate
China “fully prepared” for currency war: central banker
OKC hospital posting surgery prices online, creating bidding war
Apple becomes most valuable company in history
ICE officers storm farm without a warrant, handcuff farmer for filming
Hong Kong to get world's second bitcoin ATM
West Sacramento Police officer in custody in sex assault, kidnap charges
Renouncing Your U.S. Citizenship: Is Divorcing Uncle Sam Right For You?
The Food-Truck Business Stinks
Internet sites targeted by British MPs for first time ‘in chilling threat to free speech’
Warren Buffett plans $2 billion a year Australian spending spree
Jim Rogers: I am still in wait-and-watch mode on India
Bumper Stickers Could Land Michigan Drivers In Jail
Verizon Files Patent for Creepy Device To Watch You While You Watch TV
How a 1983 US-NATO war game came close to provoking nuclear attack