
“The case centers around the Firearms Freedom Act, which invokes states rights under the 9th and 10th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and declares that ‘any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitution to regulate commerce among states.’ The FFA was first passed in Montana. It has since been adopted and enacted in at least nine other states and introduced in approximately 20. The Ninth Circuit essentially ruled that federal law requires gun manufacturers, gun shop owners and dealers to keep records, pay fees and make themselves available to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives for inspection.”
Related posts:
Sioux tribes take to the Internet to buy back sacred land
Cops Find Less than 1 Oz of Weed at a Party, Throw Over 70 People in Jail
Over 1,200 Minnesota Parents Are Suing to Shut Down Child Protective Services
Obamacare Cost Me Full-Time Work
Chinese Investors Pile Into Bitcoin; BTC China Raises $5 Million
The War on Air Conditioning Heats Up
When Cops Rape ... and Nothing Happens
Once Again, Activists Must Beg the Government to Preserve the Right to Repair
Startup Cities To Become Reality
Syrian Insurgent Provocations: Going For Endgame?
Separated Children Forced to Recite Pledge of Allegiance 'Out of Respect'
Syria’s Assad to West: ‘I Am Tougher Than Gaddafi’
Persian Handmade Shoes: Why Bitcoin
Congress Legalizes Warrantless Forfeiture of Private Communications
Gold Sector: A Small Fish in a Big Pond