
“US officials declined to comment on whether the military action under consideration would go beyond the use of cruise missiles and require fighter aircraft to enter Syrian airspace. ‘We’re exploring every option,’ the official said. If the United States took no military action against Damascus, then it would send a dangerous signal to other regimes with chemical stockpiles, including North Korea, the official said. Citing North Korea, the official said ‘what’s to say, as they (the North Koreans) watch this play out in Syria, they wouldn’t use weapons like this?’ Obama’s aides were still working to define the precise objective of any potential intervention, a second administration official said.”
Related posts:
Idea of Euro Exit Finds Currency in Portugal
Scenes from a militarized America: Iowa family ‘terrorized’
Vicco to consider paying police chief in Bitcoin
How occupational licensing laws inhibit interstate mobility
Cheese shop owner on crusade to block FDA ban on mimolette
iPhone 5S fingerprint reader manages to remain secure for almost 3 days
Scotland will vote on referendum for independence in 2014
Britain considers banning Internet pornography over ‘corroding’ influence on children
For Norway, Oil at $50 Is Worse Than the Global Financial Crisis
USDA skeptical of Monsanto sabotage claim in ‘zombie wheat’ probe
Vladimir Putin defends the U.S. on spying programs, drones and Occupy Wall Street
South Korean Activists Send Leaflets to North Korea
New York state to mull bitcoin licensing proposal
'The worst case of scientific censorship since the church banned Copernicus’
French farmer's industrial snail-slime harvesting process to feed cosmetic industry