“In February 2013, an IRS examiner combing over the couple’s return wanted to know whether the wife’s act of submitting a ‘married filing jointly’ Form 1040 had accidentally turned the husband into a U.S. person, even if they had not explicitly made a § 6013(g) election for a nonresident alien spouse to be treated as a resident alien for tax purposes. Such treatment would saddle him with an obligation to file Form 3520 on what the IRS hilariously calls ‘foreign trusts’ and what the husband probably thinks of as ‘my local & fully-tax-compliant retirement account’ — and since the would-be joint return apparently didn’t include any 3520s for him, the couple would have been subject to penalties.”
Related posts:
Afghan probe into civilian killings stymied by US refusal to cooperate
Trump Impeachment Begins (But Not For War Crimes Or JFK Cover-Up)
Terror Attacks And Terror Drills: A Series Of Strange Coincidences
Snowden’s E-Mail Provider Defied FBI Demands to Turn Over Crypto Keys
As Silk Road 2.0 Pops Up, The Government Needs To Avoid Moral Panic
Israeli security strip searches Arab journalist at U.S. July Fourth party
Sessions Asks Congress To Undo Medical Marijuana Protections
How to Finance a Second Passport, and More…
Facebook Monitors Private Messages and Photos, Reports to Police
Trump Warms Up To Nuclear First-Strike
NDAA Opponents Just Won Their Biggest Victory Since The Blocking Of Indefinite Detention
Ron Paul: Progress Toward Peace in 2013, But Dark Clouds Remain
Saudi Arabia budget 2016: domestic and regional effects
Hillary Clinton: Stop helping terrorists, Silicon Valley – weaken encryption
Catholic bishops: Indefinite detention ‘wounds the moral reputation of our nation’