“You may remember a rather wonderful court case from 2012 that pitted copyright lawyers against patent lawyers over the issue of whether submitting journal articles as part of the patenting process was fair use. Well, we now have the judge’s decision. US Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes sided with the patent lawyers, ruling that the reason they made unlicensed copies of the articles was to comply with the law for submitting applications to the patent office — and not to compete within the market for scientific journals. The USPTO had already thrown its weight behind the idea that copies of scientific articles submitted as part of the patent application were indeed fair use.”
Related posts:
In homebuying, cash is king again
Obama invades Cyprus in order to NOT invade Syria
Goldman Sachs Buys Gold; Tells Public to Sell
Perversity of Modern White-Collar Criminal Remedies
Government Mismanagement Causes California Water Crisis
Ignoring Drug Advisors, Britain Bans Khat
Journal Explores Incentive For False Results In Lab Tests For DUI
Bitcoin Trading Notes: Market Momentum and Spread Trading
Playing The Surge In Precious Metals, II
Nigel Farage: We Are Now Entering The Terrifying End Game
Federal appeals court overturns Texas ordinance blocking undocumented tenants from renting
Bystander’s YouTube upload shows cops shooting, killing fleeing man
This Website Advertises A Bunch Of Jobs That Pay In Bitcoin
It’s (Almost) Official: Tax Debt = No Passport
The French National Sport Is Taxation, not Soccer