“You may remember a rather wonderful court case from 2012 that pitted copyright lawyers against patent lawyers over the issue of whether submitting journal articles as part of the patenting process was fair use. Well, we now have the judge’s decision. US Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes sided with the patent lawyers, ruling that the reason they made unlicensed copies of the articles was to comply with the law for submitting applications to the patent office — and not to compete within the market for scientific journals. The USPTO had already thrown its weight behind the idea that copies of scientific articles submitted as part of the patent application were indeed fair use.”
(Visited 22 times, 1 visits today)
Related posts:
NDAA Indefinite Detention Opponents File Supreme Court Emergency Motion
Holder: Limit journalistic privilege in Jeffrey Sterling’s espionage trial
Chicago's Cash-on-Hand Plunges
Gallup Poll: Americans Trust Cops & Military Above Nearly Everything Else
Banned From the US? There's a Robot for That
TSA Releases Data on Air Marshal Misconduct -- 7 Years After Request
19 Insane Tidbits From Ex-Employee's Lawsuit Against Google
Senate Report Highlights Cars Vulnerable to DARPA-Funded Hackers
U.S. Students Sign Petition to Legalize 4th Trimester Abortion
Bill Bonner, To the Class of 2014: You’re “Screwed”
ACLU Announces Settlement in “Highway Robbery” Cases in Texas
The Birth of a New Bull Market
FinCEN: Cloud Mining, Escrow Services Aren’t Money Transmitters
US Expats and Retained Earnings in Foreign Corporations for 2018
PayPal May be Planning Virtual ‘Tokens’ According to eBay Patent App