“You may remember a rather wonderful court case from 2012 that pitted copyright lawyers against patent lawyers over the issue of whether submitting journal articles as part of the patenting process was fair use. Well, we now have the judge’s decision. US Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Keyes sided with the patent lawyers, ruling that the reason they made unlicensed copies of the articles was to comply with the law for submitting applications to the patent office — and not to compete within the market for scientific journals. The USPTO had already thrown its weight behind the idea that copies of scientific articles submitted as part of the patent application were indeed fair use.”
Related posts:
Justice Department sues Florida over ‘deliberate indifference’ in treatment of disabled children
Russian report on chemical attack indicates similarity with rebel-made weapons
5-Year-Old Fined £150 for Selling Lemonade
Billionaire: Part-Timers Will Near 50% of Workforce Due to ObamaCare
Bitcoins in Argentina: A New Safe Haven?
Bruce Schneier: Economist Detained for Doing Math on an Airplane
Japan Resorts To Teenage Girls In Short Skirts To Get Their Stocks Up
12-Year-Old Targeted By Idaho Tax Commission For Raspberry Stand
Europe ensures second-class experience for Web users as GDPR takes effect
White House chef says future food to be made from chemicals, not real food ingredients
Gold, the Titanic & Lifeboats - Why it's Important to Own Physical Gold
Ben Swann: NSA Using Copyright Claims to Stop Criticism?
The Hidden Arms Race
US Expropriates, Imprisons Bitcoin Trader For Carrying Cash in a Trader Joe's Sack
Historic 1oz gold coin goes for $4.6 million at auction